August 29th :: Keytars
August 29th :: Keytars
LET THERE BE PODCAST!
- anotherearth
- Posts: 224
- Joined: 09 Nov 2006, 21:25
- Location: somewhere other than here
- StoneageRocker
- Ret-con'd: Correct
- Posts: 193
- Joined: 26 Dec 2006, 11:23
- Location: Over there!
Ok I didn't let myself get drawn into the time-travel debate as its a comedy video, anyhoo a Podcast isn't a comedy video so I couldn't help myself.
Time is not a human construct, it is a valid dimension just like space (length, width, depth), Hence Einstein's theories of Special Relativity and General Relativity. So there (poke tongue out smilely)
Also I get really annoyed by in films people casually refering to the "fact" that Einstein "proved" that going back in time is impossible, he certainly never proved that is impossible, or even gave any proof of such. And although the systems that would have to be used to travel back in time are not possible with todays technology but it still is theorectically possible.
For more info read Time Travel in Einstein's Universe (Paperback) by Richard Got, tis a really good book
/end of nerdy rant
Time is not a human construct, it is a valid dimension just like space (length, width, depth), Hence Einstein's theories of Special Relativity and General Relativity. So there (poke tongue out smilely)
Also I get really annoyed by in films people casually refering to the "fact" that Einstein "proved" that going back in time is impossible, he certainly never proved that is impossible, or even gave any proof of such. And although the systems that would have to be used to travel back in time are not possible with todays technology but it still is theorectically possible.
For more info read Time Travel in Einstein's Universe (Paperback) by Richard Got, tis a really good book
/end of nerdy rant
In England.........
StoneageRocker wrote:Ok I didn't let myself get drawn into the time-travel debate as its a comedy video, anyhoo a Podcast isn't a comedy video so I couldn't help myself.
Time is not a human construct, it is a valid dimension just like space (length, width, depth), Hence Einstein's theories of Special Relativity and General Relativity. So there (poke tongue out smilely)
Also I get really annoyed by in films people casually refering to the "fact" that Einstein "proved" that going back in time is impossible, he certainly never proved that is impossible, or even gave any proof of such. And although the systems that would have to be used to travel back in time are not possible with todays technology but it still is theorectically possible.
For more info read Time Travel in Einstein's Universe (Paperback) by Richard Got, tis a really good book
/end of nerdy rant
Ah, yes, but going on with your "possible" part, one might philisophically say that going back in time is unethical because you might change something in the future. Just like that one short story by that one guy who did that writing thing.
I mean, you would change it, go back, and everything would be changed, and it's possible JUST POSSIBLE that you may have never been born. And if that were true, then the change would have never happened. And you would not exist and exist at the same time. And it's possible, just possible, that because you never existed that change would never have occured, you would still be born again. But you might ALSO still exist before that. Leaving two copies of you at the same time. One's just older. Of course it's also possible you dissapear in a puff of logic after you stop existing.
It's these paradoxes Doc from BTTF wouldn't shut up about.
So, there's me on philosphy (would that be philosophy? Or does philosophy even exist? Hmm...). Therefore, past time travel will ultimately suck. And that's why we shouldn't even try.
Although, I see no problem with going to the future. BUT YOU MAY NOT RETURN.
- Master Gunner
- Defending us from The Dutch!
- Posts: 19383
- Joined: 29 Oct 2006, 12:19
- First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
- Location: In Limbo.
I'd like to mention that short people tend to live longer than tall people.
Which is suddenly working out better for me than my two brothers, who I was consoling it with until last year.
For the challenge, I'm mildly tempted to photograph myself whacking off to the LRR site, but no, I don't think so.
Which is suddenly working out better for me than my two brothers, who I was consoling it with until last year.
For the challenge, I'm mildly tempted to photograph myself whacking off to the LRR site, but no, I don't think so.
- The Pious Flea
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 15:22
- Location: The Mote in God's Eye
The Pious Flea wrote:Yukikaze wrote:For the challenge, I'm mildly tempted to photograph myself whacking off to the LRR site, but no, I don't think so.
DO WANT
Also: I might carve Lavos + Lrr on a tree with a big heart around it. If you live in the trout lake area you would probably see it.
i dont know what's happening anymore
- tak197
- Feito Com Fruta
- Posts: 9010
- Joined: 13 Mar 2007, 19:20
- First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
- Location: Stroudsburg, PA
- Contact:
Lavos wrote:The Pious Flea wrote:Yukikaze wrote:For the challenge, I'm mildly tempted to photograph myself whacking off to the LRR site, but no, I don't think so.
DO WANT
Also: I might carve Lavos + Lrr on a tree with a big heart around it. If you live in the trout lake area you would probably see it.
This is a hard challenge, cuz the really good ideas require another person to take the picture for it to look good.
I have a good idea for someone else to do (cuz i already have a forum rank, and I'm WAAAY too busy withc school and work to do it). Basically make your friend the logo, in which they are the large dot, and you put three smaller dots on their right side on a pole of sorts, and then attach the arrow on the left side. (Myspace is being butt, or else i'd show you the crude diagram of what i mean.) Then, you take romantic pictures of you and your friend at a cafe, or on the beach, or skipping through the meadow. Just avoid violating the logo, as you are asking your FRIEND to do this for you.
The Pious Flea wrote:Yukikaze wrote:For the challenge, I'm mildly tempted to photograph myself whacking off to the LRR site, but no, I don't think so.
DO NOT WANT
Hence why I didn't, as I don't want that out on the 'net any more than you do, but the thought did cross my mind, and it's not prohibited by the contest rules, explicitly or implicitly.
Also, that kind of reaction is why I say and do some of the things I say and do. I find it funny.
- HomerTheBrave
- Posts: 99
- Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 21:26
- Location: Skeedaddle (Seattle)
- Contact:
- Dr Frankenjam
- Posts: 945
- Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 11:47
- Location: En-ger-land
- Contact:
Lavos wrote:The Pious Flea wrote:Yukikaze wrote:For the challenge, I'm mildly tempted to photograph myself whacking off to the LRR site, but no, I don't think so.
DO WANT
Also: I might carve Lavos + Lrr on a tree with a big heart around it. If you live in the trout lake area you would probably see it.
I might do the same, but in my arm and with a pair of compasses.
- Alja-Markir
- Trebuchet Enthusiast
- Posts: 5699
- Joined: 04 Feb 2007, 21:03
- Location: Deep In Space
- tak197
- Feito Com Fruta
- Posts: 9010
- Joined: 13 Mar 2007, 19:20
- First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
- Location: Stroudsburg, PA
- Contact:
Alja-Markir wrote:They say a picture is worth a thousand words...
Oh yeah. Feel the love. *silly grin*
~Alja-Markir~
Not quite the lovin they were talking about, but still it's pretty funny.
/hat off
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests