Phailhaüs - 04

For videos that aren't... y'know... "real". Whatever Thing, Phailhaüs, etc.
User avatar
Vaughn
Posts: 2894
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 04:43
Location: Calgary, Alberta

Postby Vaughn » 31 Mar 2008, 06:38

Zed Alpha wrote:
Except...don't make phun phof phour phussies phin pharmor...:D

fun fof four fussies fin farmor?
Do the Catterpillar!
*wiggle wiggle*
User avatar
DicyDax
Posts: 302
Joined: 30 Mar 2008, 05:58
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Postby DicyDax » 31 Mar 2008, 07:00

Graham wrote:
DicyDax wrote:INTERLACE!

I know, I know.

:cry:

I forgot.

You know, one of my mates were at this anime con, and they were showing fan parodies (also AMV's), and he was sitting besides this guy who would shout "INTERLACE" when he would spot it. And he did. At several occasions.
User avatar
webrunner
Posts: 19
Joined: 26 Feb 2008, 11:58
Location: Hamilton
Contact:

Postby webrunner » 31 Mar 2008, 09:01

I read "Ask Kathleen" as "Ash Ketchum"


Take from that what you will.
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 14:20

Tell you what.

You get a team of pale European Rugby players together, and I'll gather up a group of three hundred pound NFL linebackers. We'll set them up to play American Football without any padding and just see who's the first one cry and demand "armour."

Seriously, I've heard the "Rugby is tougher because they don't wear padding" excuse so many times. LOOK WHO'S PLAYING IT.

Here's a thought, by that logic, the ice Hockey that you Canadians love so much is just women's field hockey played on ice by "pussies who need to wear armor." :roll:
-Wraith
User avatar
DicyDax
Posts: 302
Joined: 30 Mar 2008, 05:58
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Postby DicyDax » 31 Mar 2008, 14:23

Wraith wrote:Tell you what.

You get a team of pale European Rugby players together, and I'll gather up a group of three hundred pound NFL linebackers. We'll set them up to play American Football without any padding and just see who's the first one cry and demand "armour."

Seriously, I've heard the "Rugby is tougher because they don't wear padding" excuse so many times. LOOK WHO'S PLAYING IT.

I bet the Rugby players would win.
User avatar
Graham
Super Moderator
Posts: 15038
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 19:37
Location: Victoria, BC
Contact:

Postby Graham » 31 Mar 2008, 14:28

I don't think you've actually looked at who's playing it, Wraith.
Have you seen the All Blacks? The Springboks? If you're thinking some weeny, lanky Brits are mincing about on the rugby pitch, you've got another thing coming.
User avatar
DicyDax
Posts: 302
Joined: 30 Mar 2008, 05:58
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Postby DicyDax » 31 Mar 2008, 14:30

Graham wrote:you've got another thing coming.
Ain't that like some song. From ... the 80's or summat?
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 14:39

Have you ever SEEN the average rugby player? They're about my size. You ever see a 300lb Rugby player? First time they got the ball they'd be snapped in half first time they were tackled.
-Wraith
User avatar
Lyinginbedmon
Posts: 10808
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
First Video: BioShocked
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
Contact:

Postby Lyinginbedmon » 31 Mar 2008, 14:40

I notice no-one has pointed out this little factoid:

Neither Salisbury, Conneticut or Salisbury, Wiltshire are related to the Salisbury Steak, also known as the "hamburger steak". It's actually named for James Salisbury, an American from New York around the time of the American Civil War, who was convinced that diarrhea suffered by the soldiers could be cured with regular meals of coffee and lean beef steak.

And I agree on the Rugby/American Football argument. Yes, it's true that because they wear armour the AF players can do even tougher things. Why don't Rugby players? Because they'd all be killed if they did. Rugby easily trumps AF in terms of contact danger.

I'm sure the argument could continue for a good long while, neither side winning but a stalemate, so I'll cover points now:

Americans used to be Britains. We're capable of the same stuff, Rugby players aren't "pale Europeans" and I doubt that AF players are weaklings either.
AF players wear armor, Rugby players don't. The former runs head-long at eachother with little compulsion to stop, the latter tries quite often to clothesline you because the former tactic would end up killing both in a bloody muddy mess.
Af players generally avoid kicking the ball because it leaves it open to interception, so run across the field with it. Rugby players kick the ball because the contact is rougher, so keeping the ball about your person is a suicide move.
AF players get more coverage, because AF is pretty much the national pasttime. Rugby players get less coverage, because Britains tend to be less favourable of violence, so we generally prefer Football.

So, points in favour, points against, let's just agree to disagree, like we all did back in the late 1700s. How are the French, by the way? :wink:
Last edited by Lyinginbedmon on 31 Mar 2008, 14:51, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image
Morgan wrote:Lyinginbedmon is short, but he makes up for it in awesomeness
User avatar
Red Charlie
Posts: 1060
Joined: 06 Mar 2007, 16:17
Location: Northern Ireland
Contact:

Postby Red Charlie » 31 Mar 2008, 14:50

Wraith wrote:Have you ever SEEN the average rugby player? They're about my size. You ever see a 300lb Rugby player? First time they got the ball they'd be snapped in half first time they were tackled.


I don't understand!
It was really too big:

I give you this instead


.
User avatar
Lyinginbedmon
Posts: 10808
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
First Video: BioShocked
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
Contact:

Postby Lyinginbedmon » 31 Mar 2008, 14:54

It's just occured to me:

An American is arguing against a Britain, a Canadian, and an Irishman now...


I don't think this is fair odds.
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 15:03

Most of The All Blacks' (who would get their asses kicked for having that name alone, considering they're from New Zealand and don't have a single black player) players average just over 200lbs, with half of them not even weighing that much. The defensive line in in the college football circuit averaged 285 lbs, while the offensive line hit 300.

Pro football players players are bigger, meaner, and hit harder than any Rugby player you'll ever see.
Last edited by Wraith on 31 Mar 2008, 15:04, edited 1 time in total.
-Wraith
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 15:04

Lyinginbedmon wrote:It's just occured to me:

An American is arguing against a Britain, a Canadian, and an Irishman now...


I don't think this is fair odds.


Yea, but I'm the American. If I'm arguing with less than three people I get uncomfortable :lol: .
-Wraith
User avatar
JohnyMcmuffin
THERE'S Waldo!
Posts: 420
Joined: 17 Dec 2007, 18:24
First Video: The Stages
Location: Mountain View, CA
Contact:

Postby JohnyMcmuffin » 31 Mar 2008, 15:19

Wraith wrote:Most of The All Blacks' (who would get their asses kicked for having that name alone, considering they're from New Zealand and don't have a single black player) players average just over 200lbs, with half of them not even weighing that much. The defensive line in in the college football circuit averaged 285 lbs, while the offensive line hit 300.

Pro football players players are bigger, meaner, and hit harder than any Rugby player you'll ever see.


I wonder if the armour is the reason that football players are bigger. It allows one to take much harder direct hits, while without it, you have to be able to avoid taking too much punishment. Smaller people tend to be more agile, and therefore are better suited to a sport in which contact has to be avoided.

There is not a shortage of large men in the rugby pool. The All Blacks pull from the Maoris and other islander cultures, who tend to be very large. (The university I attend starts multiple Tongans/Samoans/Pollies on the american football team.) It isn't the lack of large men that decides the size in rugby, but the nature of the game.
Image
Image
User avatar
Lyinginbedmon
Posts: 10808
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
First Video: BioShocked
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
Contact:

Postby Lyinginbedmon » 31 Mar 2008, 15:25

To give a vaguely-apt analogy, against a guy with small arms fire you want body armor, against a guy with a rocket launcher you want to run like heck.
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 15:35

Lyinginbedmon wrote:
Americans used to be Britains. We're capable of the same stuff,


And humans used to be monkeys (BAD Wraith, BAD. Totally uncalled for. I just couldn't not say it once it entered my head).

About a quarter of us used decended from Britains. Namely the ones that didn't fit in well over there, came here, gave up tea and krumpets for coffee and steak, then decided they were sick of England and proceeded to kick their ass. If you had been capable of the same stuff, we would still be British. [/macho American chest-beating]

Lyinginbedmon wrote:AF players wear armor, Rugby players don't. The former runs head-long at eachother with little compulsion to stop, the latter tries quite often to clothesline you because the former tactic would end up killing both in a bloody muddy mess.


Have you ever actually clotheslined anyone? There's two ways to do it: one involved the arm going into the neck. If the other person is running, this will likely kill them. The other involves the arm hitting the person's chest, which is to a propper tackle what an open-handed slap is to a strong right hook.

Lyinginbedmon wrote:Af players generally avoid kicking the ball because it leaves it open to interception, so run across the field with it.


Actually, we avoid kicking because with the rules the way they are, it just doesn't accomplish anything.

Lyinginbedmon wrote: Rugby players kick the ball because the contact is rougher, so keeping the ball about your person is a suicide move.


In other words, they don't want to get hit.



yea. We're the pussies.

Lyinginbedmon wrote:AF players get more coverage, because AF is pretty much the national pasttime. Rugby players get less coverage, because Britains tend to be less favourable of violence, so we generally prefer Football.


Wraith wrote:

yea. We're the pussies.
-Wraith
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 15:38

JohnyMcmuffin wrote:
I wonder if the extra hundred pounds of angry black man is the reason that football players are bigger.


You know, I think it is.
-Wraith
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 15:40

Lyinginbedmon wrote:To give a vaguely-apt analogy, against a guy with small arms fire you want body armor, against a guy with a rocket launcher you want to run like heck.


No, against a guy with a rocket launcher you want to run like heck.





We just want a bigger rocket launcher. Used to be British. :wink:
-Wraith
User avatar
Lyinginbedmon
Posts: 10808
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
First Video: BioShocked
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
Contact:

Postby Lyinginbedmon » 31 Mar 2008, 15:46

Wraith wrote:...then decided they were sick of England and proceeded to kick their ass. If you had been capable of the same stuff, we would still be British. [/macho American chest-beating]

I'm trying not to laugh here...

Okay, without going into a big historical tirade, you're way off. You never left America, your best ally was France, and you were against the entire British Empire and then some. "Kick their [hind-quarters]" is our theoretical perspective, not yours. Fortunately King George thought it wasn't worth the bother to slaughter you treasonous dogs than it was to simply trade.

The American Revolutionary War was akin to the Iraq War, but with a better ending.
Wraith wrote:...In other words, they don't want to get hit.



yea. We're the pussies.

Here's a question then: If someone points at gun at you, do you duck?

Seriously, you're the wimps because you wear armour to avoid insta-death. We're not because we forgoe the armour and avoid the insta-death. For you it's a bad bruise, maybe a concussion, possible a broken limb, for us it's a near-death catastrophe in the least.
Last edited by Lyinginbedmon on 31 Mar 2008, 15:49, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Vaughn
Posts: 2894
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 04:43
Location: Calgary, Alberta

Postby Vaughn » 31 Mar 2008, 15:46

Wraith wrote:
Lyinginbedmon wrote:To give a vaguely-apt analogy, against a guy with small arms fire you want body armor, against a guy with a rocket launcher you want to run like heck.


No, against a guy with a rocket launcher you want to run like heck.





We just want a bigger rocket launcher. Used to be British. :wink:


against a guy with a rocket launcher, i'd rather have a portal gun.
Do the Catterpillar!

*wiggle wiggle*
User avatar
Lyinginbedmon
Posts: 10808
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
First Video: BioShocked
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
Contact:

Postby Lyinginbedmon » 31 Mar 2008, 15:57

Wraith wrote:No, against a guy with a rocket launcher you want to run like heck.

We just want a bigger rocket launcher. Used to be British. :wink:

Most people prefer to run from a rocket launcher, that's the smart thing to do....which may explain a few things.

Okay, enough with the hyperbole, on with valid argumenting.
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 16:06

Lyinginbedmon wrote:
Wraith wrote:...then decided they were sick of England and proceeded to kick their ass. If you had been capable of the same stuff, we would still be British. [/macho American chest-beating]

I'm trying not to laugh here...

Okay, without going into a big historical tirade, you're way off. You never left America,


When did I say we did?

Lyinginbedmon wrote:your best ally was France, and you were against the entire British Empire and then some.


Yeeea, I'm not sure if you meant that part to make your losing seem more pathetic, but if not, well...epic fail.

Lyinginbedmon wrote: "Kick their [hind-quarters]" is our theoretical perspective, not yours. Fortunately King George thought it wasn't worth the bother to slaughter you treasonous dogs than it was to simply trade.


Yeeeea, I used to hear that a lot after a fight.
:::guy gets up with a black eye, stumbles around:::
"You're not WORTH IT, MAN! You hear me? YOU'RE NOT WORTH IT!

Men who get their ass kicked seem to frequently decide that whoever is kicking their ass "just isn't worth it."

Funny, that.

Lyinginbedmon wrote:Here's a question then: If someone points at gun at you, do you duck?


Depends on the range. Within three feet, no. If you know what you're doing, you have better odds of survival if you attempt the disarm. The person behind the barrel is either the type of person who's going to shoot you regardless of your actions, in which case you have nothing to loose, or they're the type that don't really WANT to shoot you, but will if they feel you're forcing them to. The latter rarely expect you to try anything and can be surprised.

From further away, yea, I get out of the way because the other person has the tactical advantage. Your analogy is flawed, however, because in that scenario, one person is armed, and the other isn't. In Rugy, everyone's equally equipped (well, there's physical differences, of course, but in that case, if they're better equipped than you, that's largely your fault).

Lyinginbedmon wrote:Seriously, you're the wimps because you wear armour to avoid insta-death.


Yea, and so would Rugby players. The difference is that they don't FACE insta-death, because they're only going up against other rugby players instead of 6'6" 300+ pound football players. I guarantee you, you put a Rugby team up against a pro football team, both without pads, the Rugby team would either be begging for pads or dead by the end of the first quarter.

Lyinginbedmon wrote:We're not because we forgoe the armour and avoid the insta-death.


Wow. You don't wear a helmet to a pillow fight. What balls. :roll:
-Wraith
User avatar
Wraith
Posts: 2882
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 01:49
First Video: Canadian Approval Board
Location: Fredericksburg, VA. USA
Contact:

Postby Wraith » 31 Mar 2008, 16:09

Lyinginbedmon wrote:
Wraith wrote:No, against a guy with a rocket launcher you want to run like heck.

We just want a bigger rocket launcher. Used to be British. :wink:

Most people prefer to run from a rocket launcher, that's the smart thing to do....which may explain a few things.


We prefer to stop it so that it doesn't threaten anyone else.



Guess we're not most people. :wink:
-Wraith
User avatar
Master Gunner
Defending us from The Dutch!
Posts: 19383
Joined: 29 Oct 2006, 12:19
First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
Location: In Limbo.

Postby Master Gunner » 31 Mar 2008, 16:47

According to the Bathroom Reader (ok, maybe not the most reliable source, but whatever), the American Revolution got off to a very bad start, and was almost defeated before it began, until Washington crossed the Delaware and defeated who? The Germans. Why were you able to defeat the German mercenaries? Because they were too drunk to translate a note they had received detailing Washington's entire plan. Up until that point Washington's troops had been resoundingly beaten by the British, and moral was at it's lowest point.

So in summary, the American revolution didn't gain any momentum until they defeated an army of drunk German mercenaries...who they outnumbered almost 2:1.


That's all in the past and besides the point though. I'd rather go to a Rugby game than a (American) Football game any day. Also in Rugby, how many two second plays are there? (Although I'm sure Wraith will find a way to make that convince him that he's right).
TheRocket wrote:Apparently the crotch area could not contain the badonkadonk area.
Twitter | Click here to join the Desert Bus Community Chat.
User avatar
Zed Alpha
Posts: 906
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 13:00
Location: Kissimmee, Florida

Postby Zed Alpha » 31 Mar 2008, 16:58

Wraith wrote:Most of The All Blacks' (who would get their asses kicked for having that name alone, considering they're from New Zealand and don't have a single black player) players average just over 200lbs, with half of them not even weighing that much. The defensive line in in the college football circuit averaged 285 lbs, while the offensive line hit 300.

Pro football players players are bigger, meaner, and hit harder than any Rugby player you'll ever see.


Er..I'm on your side.

Bigger, yes. Harder. No. They're about the same. Meaner....Fuck no.

Aaand...Did Master Gunner just call George Washington a cheater? I think he just called the FATHER OF OUR COUNTRY a cheater!

And the All Blacks would, in all honesty, stomp around half of the NFL into the mud by themselves. Except for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
Frozengale wrote:You know you're on the internet when Masturbation is the first suggestion.

Return to “Bonus Video”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests