loadingreadyrun.com

I've made a new thread for Ask Kathleen, find it here:
http://loadingreadyrun.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=6058

Enjoy!

FIRST COMMENT!

DicyDax wrote:FIRST COMMENT!

Don't do that.

That gummy bacon scares the shit out of me. I am compelled to try some. It looks like it says Strawberry Flavor?

Also, damnit Graham, you've given such a plethora of .gif material lately! I'm gonna have to stock up now, because this likely means there will be a long bleak winter once the dancing slacks off.

Also, I love how totally unenthused Matt is about being part of that. You can just hear him rolling his eyes when he says 'Bird Day'.

~Alja~

oh yay! seriously i just phailed a phinal exam and then I come home to see this and it makes me pheel better about my life... yay!

Appearing
GRAHAM STARK & KATHLEEN DE VERE (AND A BIT OF MATT)

So only part of Matt is shown or Matt appears for only a small part of the video?

Also I did some math and the man viewing porn looked at it: 8 times per minute, 492 times per hour, and 3939 times per day if he worked 22 days a month and 8 hours each day and was looking at the porn the whole time he was working.
Math is fun!!

Just when you think you've heard it all; The US hits you with yet another bombshell of stupidity!
Seriusly, was the man wearing a huge flashing sign that said "Don't give me any snacks" or something?
Of course then, cops in the US seems to be able to shot unarmed civilians to death on their wedding and get away with it like nothing happened, so why would getting 9 months in jail for giving a man a snackcake suprise me.... unless the guy was diabetic and thus making it an attempted murder.

Also, how was the japanese guy even able to get any work done? I mean looking ath that much porn has to be considdered a fulltime job on it's own.
It's scary that they seemed to be counting.... also that they thought it was time to make a example of him at 780000 views...

"It's ok, he's just on his 340000:th view so it's nothing to worry about....yet, but damn him if he does it another 440000 times!"


Thank you LRR for bringing us the wierd news our regular media won't tell us

Smeghead wrote:Of course then, cops in the US seems to be able to shot unarmed civilians to death on their wedding and get away with it like nothing happened

Actually they were only tasered, but still...

yeah if this dude was looking at so much porn you would think that maybe someone else would ya know see him doing it... also, they do keep a tab on where you go on the internet (i've heard of people getting in trouble for looking at like ebay on thier company's computer) shouldn't someone have noticed the first time he went on a porn site.. not the 700000 time?

also maybe they'll send that guy who shared the snack cake to that minimum security prison...

Graham wrote:

Smeghead wrote:Of course then, cops in the US seems to be able to shot unarmed civilians to death on their wedding and get away with it like nothing happened

Actually they were only tasered, but still...

Well actually, I was refering to a case in New York that's been causing lot of demonstartions as of late.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6189442.stm
not a fun story mind you

also maybe they'll send that guy who shared the snack cake to that minimum security prison...

Would be fitting to the story.
While on teh subject; in Sweden it's not illigal to escape from jail... but it's illigal to help someone escape from jail...

New Phail came quickly!

I wish we got that gummy bacon in England. I want some.

Wow, I think that Gummy bacon made you all really goofy. Check the ingredients cuz someone may be trying to drug the populus to take over the world.

I happen to have 3 jewel-encrusted sceptres, but they're a tad busy keeping the demons of hal-shokkoth otherwise engaged. Also they were expensive and I had to kill 9 different priests and mages to get them all in a cheap value set.

(It turns out you need a larynx to invoke god or displease Neil Bohr)

EDIT:

Graham wrote:

DicyDax wrote:FIRST COMMENT!

Don't do that.

So...we apparently can have cleavage-related signature banners, but not say we posted first in a thread?

I realise it's annoying and all, that just seems like an inconsistency somehow...

A banner in your signature is at least a mark of your personality, tastes, etc, and serves to better identify someone on a forum.

"OMG FIRST!!!1!one1" posts are retarded and do nothing but waste everyone's time, effort, bandwidth, and patience.

~Alja~

Alja-Markir wrote:Also, damnit Graham, you've given such a plethora of .gif material lately! I'm gonna have to stock up now, because this likely means there will be a long bleak winter once the dancing slacks off.

BEHOLD!



~Alja~

A banner in your signature is at least a mark of your personality, tastes, etc, and serves to better identify someone on a forum.

I don't wanna go off topic here, but how do I get that to work when html scrpts are disabeled? (I seriusly don't know anything about how computers and the internet actually "work"..

Wow. Kathleen is really pretty with her new hairstyle. I mean, she was attractive before but... wow.

Smeghead wrote:

A banner in your signature is at least a mark of your personality, tastes, etc, and serves to better identify someone on a forum.

I don't wanna go off topic here, but how do I get that to work when html scrpts are disabeled? (I seriusly don't know anything about how computers and the internet actually "work"..

you use bbcode instead of html. For instance:

yeilds:



On Topic: Kathleen, looking as good and definitively female as ever. Graham, lacking stubble, but still looking good. Matt, uhhh...nice dancing? Didn't exactly see enough of him to gain an opinion of him on May 4th.
The return of Ask Kathleen was nice, and that "chewy bacon"...DO WANT.

Ah, thanks Master Gunner!

Alja-Markir wrote:A banner in your signature is at least a mark of your personality, tastes, etc, and serves to better identify someone on a forum.

Indeed. I don't mind banners so much but I do believe in putting limits on the size of them. Like when someone's banner takes up more space than that of their comment (I've seen up to 1/4 page) or they link to an enormous file that has to load for every comment they've made on a page. (I've seen one here at LRR that's 40MB). Keep it simple, I say.

so is this an ok size? (I don't want to waste space for this thread's real topic for this... so one answer will be enough)

Uh oh. This is what happened last time. Graham feeds us bonus videos for a week or two, then cuts us dry for a month. Say it ain't so!

We now have video evidence that white people cannot dance.

Is gummy bacon really much more gross than gummy frogs or brains (both of which are delicious and impossible to find nowadays)?

This really shows the gap between Canadians and Americans... Canadian murderer just walks out of prison, and he decides to come back of his own volition, but an American doing time for Bn'E gets nine months for sharing something other than the bread and water the people are normally allowed.

JesterJ. wrote:Uh oh. This is what happened last time. Graham feeds us bonus videos for a week or two, then cuts us dry for a month. Say it ain't so!

That's what YOU think.

Whatchamabiscut wrote:We now have video evidence that white people cannot dance.

Clearly I'm dancing like a ninny intentionally.