The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
-
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 03:31
- First Video: Whisky Tango Foxtrot
- Location: The ever-shifting landscape of the mind
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
What exactly is the axebane challenge anyways?
Also, went to FNM tonight. First time I ever tied due to time running out before. The rest of the night went badly, and ended with me being called a cheater by a new player. Fun. :/
Also, went to FNM tonight. First time I ever tied due to time running out before. The rest of the night went badly, and ended with me being called a cheater by a new player. Fun. :/
- Lord Hosk
- Posts: 6587
- Joined: 07 Dec 2011, 08:30
- First Video: Checkpoint: Into the breach
- Location: Half and inch below the knuckle of the ring finger. MI
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Ramp into Axebane Stag with axebane guardians in RTR limited.
Beware Bering Crystal Bears, Bearing Crystals. (Especially if the crystals they are bearing are, themselves, Bering Crystal Bears.) -Old, Stupid Proverb
[–]Graham_LRR
You hear that Khoo? We're almost better than the comic!
[–]Graham_LRR
You hear that Khoo? We're almost better than the comic!
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 15:31
- First Video: Friday Nights-Untap
- Location: You will hear on the news one day. Zombies! Wait no disregard that random word.
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
It seems like I am always get matched up with a ten yr. I am never sure if the owners think I am good influence or the reverse or that we are similarly skilled. (Although I adopt formats late I still end up placing top four consistently for the last one or two months before the next set). I don't know all the rules all the time but between !Judge! and the full rule book on my laptop I get through my forgetfulness. It is a matter of being adaptable and not getting mad when things don't go well.
Self wrote: I lost my humanity back in 2013 BC ahhhh the good old days.
Ptangmatik wrote: We drew things on your face. Oh, and you're now legally called Clivendorf von Whiffenpoofle. Congratulations.
- Utilitarian
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: 05 Nov 2012, 00:16
- First Video: Checkpoint 01
- Location: Burnaby, BC
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
FNM Tonight, I think the most fun I've had at one.
Actually finally played some Standard, went 2/2 with my "the most expensive thing in this deck is the breeding pools" Simic deck, which isn't bad. Lost the first two rounds to a 600$ deck (full Aurelias, Thundermaws, Thragtusks, the works) which I was just like "welp that's a thing that happened" lost round 2 to a pretty standard Bant control, though that one was a close 2/1. Won my next two games against what were pretty clearly "I drafted these cards" decks.
Best moment, Mystic Genesis on my opponent's tapped out Sphinx's Revelation
2/1 in the Draft, went Borzov. Win and then a close loss including a game where I'd have won if I drew ANY spell three turns in a row -_- Over all, had a grand time. Was... somewhat sad to see that my local shop evidently has some seriously insane decks being played in it. Didn't open any money though. Sadface.
Actually finally played some Standard, went 2/2 with my "the most expensive thing in this deck is the breeding pools" Simic deck, which isn't bad. Lost the first two rounds to a 600$ deck (full Aurelias, Thundermaws, Thragtusks, the works) which I was just like "welp that's a thing that happened" lost round 2 to a pretty standard Bant control, though that one was a close 2/1. Won my next two games against what were pretty clearly "I drafted these cards" decks.
Best moment, Mystic Genesis on my opponent's tapped out Sphinx's Revelation
2/1 in the Draft, went Borzov. Win and then a close loss including a game where I'd have won if I drew ANY spell three turns in a row -_- Over all, had a grand time. Was... somewhat sad to see that my local shop evidently has some seriously insane decks being played in it. Didn't open any money though. Sadface.
Look at the cards. LOOK AT THE CARDS!
The Saga of Ballchannels: My Dwarf Fortress Let's Play
The Saga of Ballchannels: My Dwarf Fortress Let's Play
- Duckay
- Posts: 3706
- Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 00:57
- First Video: Man Cooking
- Location: Central Coast, Australia
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Alright, here's a thing.
Recently I played in a draft and the following situation happened.
Them: I'll swing with Metropolis Sprite and pay 1 to give it +1/-1.
Me: In response, I'll play Beckon Apparition, exiling (some card from my graveyard, forget what) to create a spirit and block the sprite.
Them: You can't do that now, you missed the declare blockers step.
Me: You didn't give me a chance to declare blocks yet.
Them: Well, then I won't pay the 1 for the sprite unless you don't block.
They were being kind of pushy and I didn't want to start a fight over a tournament that wasn't that serious so I backed off. But I want to know:
a) Was I right in what I was trying to do, and in thinking that he shouldn't have been able to 'take back' using the sprite's ability until I had actually said no blocks?
b) Any advice on how I can handle this situation in future gracefully?
I feel like that by insisting on 'taking back' his action, even after I pointed out that I wouldn't have created a blocker at instant speed if he hadn't done that, he was playing, well, unfairly. If you do something in a tournament, even if it's not a high-stakes one, you shouldn't be able to 'take back' an action just because your opponent does something unexpected in response.
Recently I played in a draft and the following situation happened.
Them: I'll swing with Metropolis Sprite and pay 1 to give it +1/-1.
Me: In response, I'll play Beckon Apparition, exiling (some card from my graveyard, forget what) to create a spirit and block the sprite.
Them: You can't do that now, you missed the declare blockers step.
Me: You didn't give me a chance to declare blocks yet.
Them: Well, then I won't pay the 1 for the sprite unless you don't block.
They were being kind of pushy and I didn't want to start a fight over a tournament that wasn't that serious so I backed off. But I want to know:
a) Was I right in what I was trying to do, and in thinking that he shouldn't have been able to 'take back' using the sprite's ability until I had actually said no blocks?
b) Any advice on how I can handle this situation in future gracefully?
I feel like that by insisting on 'taking back' his action, even after I pointed out that I wouldn't have created a blocker at instant speed if he hadn't done that, he was playing, well, unfairly. If you do something in a tournament, even if it's not a high-stakes one, you shouldn't be able to 'take back' an action just because your opponent does something unexpected in response.
- Utilitarian
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: 05 Nov 2012, 00:16
- First Video: Checkpoint 01
- Location: Burnaby, BC
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
That was indeed an illegal move on his part. He says
"Declare attackers. Pump Sprite"
At no point have you indicated that you have passed priority to allow the transition to the Declare Blockers step. He, of course, assumed you would not be declaring any blockers because he was being short sighted, so he assumed that when he declared the pump on the sprite was irrelevant.
I would assume that, if questioned about it in a vacuum, he would have said "well of course I only pump the sprite in blockers to play around suddenly appearing blockers!" But as the situation played out, he didn't do that.
"Declare attackers. Pump Sprite"
At no point have you indicated that you have passed priority to allow the transition to the Declare Blockers step. He, of course, assumed you would not be declaring any blockers because he was being short sighted, so he assumed that when he declared the pump on the sprite was irrelevant.
I would assume that, if questioned about it in a vacuum, he would have said "well of course I only pump the sprite in blockers to play around suddenly appearing blockers!" But as the situation played out, he didn't do that.
Look at the cards. LOOK AT THE CARDS!
The Saga of Ballchannels: My Dwarf Fortress Let's Play
The Saga of Ballchannels: My Dwarf Fortress Let's Play
- Volafortis
- Posts: 926
- Joined: 17 Jun 2011, 23:30
- First Video: I am a spam bot.
- Location: The frozen wastes, Minnesota
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
If they don't give you the opportunity to declare blockers, and use the ability without acknowledging that they've moved past declaring blockers step of combat, they used the ability before blockers were declared, technically. At a competitive REL, they would've been required to suck it up and deal with your block and trade.
That said, often, as long as it wasn't a frequent occurrence from the player, and as long as they're not an asshole, and it's just a casual draft of FNM, I'd allow them to take it back the first time they make the mistake, as a lot of newer players tend to rush through steps. After the first time, though, I'd definitely start catching them on it, as the only way they'll learn not to make that mistake is to lose from it a few times.
That said, often, as long as it wasn't a frequent occurrence from the player, and as long as they're not an asshole, and it's just a casual draft of FNM, I'd allow them to take it back the first time they make the mistake, as a lot of newer players tend to rush through steps. After the first time, though, I'd definitely start catching them on it, as the only way they'll learn not to make that mistake is to lose from it a few times.
- Lord Hosk
- Posts: 6587
- Joined: 07 Dec 2011, 08:30
- First Video: Checkpoint: Into the breach
- Location: Half and inch below the knuckle of the ring finger. MI
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
There is a little wiggle room.
They could activate the ability after the declare blockers step since abilities happen at instant speed.
its iffy based on how they said it but I would say they activated the ability before your declare blockers step so in response to their activation you create your spirit and kill his sprite.
After they declared attackers, there is a priority where each player can "respond" they clearly did this with their pump, you would then be able to respond to their response. After the stack resolves which would be you exile a card, you create a spirit, they pump (which would have to happen since its on the stack) if no one else has a "response" you can declare blockers. which they could then respond to and you could respond to their response. then damage is dealt then there is a check to see if any creature has damage over their toughness which they each do killing both creatures.
Them being kinda pushy in a low stakes event is bad form on their part, letting it slide was the best way to handle it from the "graceful" standpoint but it seems they were in the wrong and they knew it but didnt want to lose.
How to handle it gracefully, say "you are incorrect, your sprite should die but I will let it slide this time to keep play going, You dont attack, I wont block lets play the game" or "you are incorrect, your sprite should die but I will let it slide this time to keep play going,I wont cast this but keep in mind that I can cast it in response to your attack if you do that again"
How to handle it by the rules say "no, you declared attackers and activated the ability together you never asked if I have a response there are plenty of options, I could have this card, or a creature with flying and flash. I respond to your activation with the spell and create the spirit and block with it, your sprite dies, sorry thats the rules"
How to handle it if they protest. "JUDGE!"
"They declared their attack and said he would activate the ability I responded with this card and block, their sprite dies correct?"
(also typing spirit and sprite over and over is hard)
They could activate the ability after the declare blockers step since abilities happen at instant speed.
its iffy based on how they said it but I would say they activated the ability before your declare blockers step so in response to their activation you create your spirit and kill his sprite.
After they declared attackers, there is a priority where each player can "respond" they clearly did this with their pump, you would then be able to respond to their response. After the stack resolves which would be you exile a card, you create a spirit, they pump (which would have to happen since its on the stack) if no one else has a "response" you can declare blockers. which they could then respond to and you could respond to their response. then damage is dealt then there is a check to see if any creature has damage over their toughness which they each do killing both creatures.
Them being kinda pushy in a low stakes event is bad form on their part, letting it slide was the best way to handle it from the "graceful" standpoint but it seems they were in the wrong and they knew it but didnt want to lose.
How to handle it gracefully, say "you are incorrect, your sprite should die but I will let it slide this time to keep play going, You dont attack, I wont block lets play the game" or "you are incorrect, your sprite should die but I will let it slide this time to keep play going,I wont cast this but keep in mind that I can cast it in response to your attack if you do that again"
How to handle it by the rules say "no, you declared attackers and activated the ability together you never asked if I have a response there are plenty of options, I could have this card, or a creature with flying and flash. I respond to your activation with the spell and create the spirit and block with it, your sprite dies, sorry thats the rules"
How to handle it if they protest. "JUDGE!"
"They declared their attack and said he would activate the ability I responded with this card and block, their sprite dies correct?"
(also typing spirit and sprite over and over is hard)
Beware Bering Crystal Bears, Bearing Crystals. (Especially if the crystals they are bearing are, themselves, Bering Crystal Bears.) -Old, Stupid Proverb
[–]Graham_LRR
You hear that Khoo? We're almost better than the comic!
[–]Graham_LRR
You hear that Khoo? We're almost better than the comic!
- Duckay
- Posts: 3706
- Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 00:57
- First Video: Man Cooking
- Location: Central Coast, Australia
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Volafortis wrote:That said, often, as long as it wasn't a frequent occurrence from the player, and as long as they're not an asshole, and it's just a casual draft of FNM, I'd allow them to take it back the first time they make the mistake, as a lot of newer players tend to rush through steps. After the first time, though, I'd definitely start catching them on it, as the only way they'll learn not to make that mistake is to lose from it a few times.
I guess part of the reason why it bugged me so much is because I know the person in question has been playing more than long enough and frequently enough to know better.
-
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 03:31
- First Video: Whisky Tango Foxtrot
- Location: The ever-shifting landscape of the mind
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Personally, I would have called a judge over if that person was being pushy about it. When he knows he did wrong but basically is forcing you to let him survive anyways, that's when it's time to call a judge. If it were a newer player then I'd likely have just let it go depending on the situation.
- Duckay
- Posts: 3706
- Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 00:57
- First Video: Man Cooking
- Location: Central Coast, Australia
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
It's true. I shouldn't have let him get away withit.
Really the advice I need is to stand my ground.
Really the advice I need is to stand my ground.
- Dubious_wolf
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: 30 Nov 2009, 09:52
- First Video: Mercenary Solutions 2
- Location: My room eating YOUR cheese-its
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
First incarnation of Zur, the Enchanter has been assembled. At least I finally have something to play with at MTG.
^( " )^
winner!
winner!
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
So I watched a lot of the coverage this weekend of GP San Diego, a Modern event won by an Eggs deck. All I could think of though watching when it was one of the featured matches was the most recent Friday Nights... so congrats to Jer, apparently in my mind you just won a GP!
- phlip
- Posts: 1790
- Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 17:48
- First Video: Eternal Sonata (Unskippable)
- Location: Australia
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Presumably whoever actually won the GP knows that an Eggs deck can just continue to go off in response to the "Draw a card" triggers, rather than letting them resolve and getting decked by them...
While no one overhear you quickly tell me not cow cow.
but how about watch phone?
[he/him/his]
but how about watch phone?
[he/him/his]
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
phlip wrote:Presumably whoever actually won the GP knows that an Eggs deck can just continue to go off in response to the "Draw a card" triggers, rather than letting them resolve and getting decked by them...
Yes I believe so
The player who won with it was Nathan Holiday and he obviously knew the deck very well as even when he was going off with it, it was all really quick and smooth (well as quick as it can be when you're going off with an Eggs deck).
Probably the highlight of watching it though was when he was up against Brian Kibler, who brought out an actual "F6" and put it on the table when all the combo stuff was going off.
- Utilitarian
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: 05 Nov 2012, 00:16
- First Video: Checkpoint 01
- Location: Burnaby, BC
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
JQuill wrote:phlip wrote:Presumably whoever actually won the GP knows that an Eggs deck can just continue to go off in response to the "Draw a card" triggers, rather than letting them resolve and getting decked by them...
Yes I believe so
The player who won with it was Nathan Holiday and he obviously knew the deck very well as even when he was going off with it, it was all really quick and smooth (well as quick as it can be when you're going off with an Eggs deck).
Probably the highlight of watching it though was when he was up against Brian Kibler, who brought out an actual "F6" and put it on the table when all the combo stuff was going off.
That's just fantastic.
Look at the cards. LOOK AT THE CARDS!
The Saga of Ballchannels: My Dwarf Fortress Let's Play
The Saga of Ballchannels: My Dwarf Fortress Let's Play
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Not only did Kibler use a "F6" he went to the bathroom
There must always be a Stark in the Moonbase
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Wow. Is there any coverage of that online? I would love to see that.
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
On their Youtube Channel you can see you can see matches from round 4-15 + Top 8
http://www.youtube.com/user/ggslive?feature=g-subs-u
http://www.youtube.com/user/ggslive?feature=g-subs-u
There must always be a Stark in the Moonbase
- Utilitarian
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: 05 Nov 2012, 00:16
- First Video: Checkpoint 01
- Location: Burnaby, BC
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Man... Modern is... less fun to watch than Standard and Limited.
Look at the cards. LOOK AT THE CARDS!
The Saga of Ballchannels: My Dwarf Fortress Let's Play
The Saga of Ballchannels: My Dwarf Fortress Let's Play
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Here, let me fix that for you
Utilitarian wrote:Man... Modern is... less fun
I walk the planes down in Ravnicaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
- Dubious_wolf
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: 30 Nov 2009, 09:52
- First Video: Mercenary Solutions 2
- Location: My room eating YOUR cheese-its
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Yeah most of the constructed formats suck.
Although I did play a simic deck a friend had pit together teo fridays ago.
2 and 3 but I was cackling like a mad man I was having so much fun.
In other words having a competently put together deck of cards helps. (But I refuse to drop $200.)
Although I did play a simic deck a friend had pit together teo fridays ago.
2 and 3 but I was cackling like a mad man I was having so much fun.
In other words having a competently put together deck of cards helps. (But I refuse to drop $200.)
^( " )^
winner!
winner!
-
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 03:31
- First Video: Whisky Tango Foxtrot
- Location: The ever-shifting landscape of the mind
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
I like standard. But I'm not going to delve into Modern and Legacy anytime soon. Having access to almost any card can just be absurd. I'm even hesitant to even get into Commander for that reason.
But I still prefer limited. Too bad I don't like drafting on MTGO much.
But I still prefer limited. Too bad I don't like drafting on MTGO much.
- Dubious_wolf
- Posts: 2761
- Joined: 30 Nov 2009, 09:52
- First Video: Mercenary Solutions 2
- Location: My room eating YOUR cheese-its
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
At least with edh you only need one copy of a card.
And it helps with randomness to the point there aren't 0 turn win conditions.
And it helps with randomness to the point there aren't 0 turn win conditions.
^( " )^
winner!
winner!
-
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 03:31
- First Video: Whisky Tango Foxtrot
- Location: The ever-shifting landscape of the mind
Re: The General Magic: The Gathering Thread
Except there are some good cards that cost $40 a piece. So you might not need four of them, but given you have a 100 card deck, it can actually end up costing you more (in theory).
Return to “Magic: The Gathering”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests