LRRDraft #71 - Pot O' Gold

Talk about the latest LRR draft videos or Friday Nights.
User avatar
Super Moderator
Posts: 1000576
Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 18:31
First Video: Tetris
Location: Victoria, BC

LRRDraft #71 - Pot O' Gold

Postby Paul » 18 Mar 2015, 17:08

Graham and James jump in a 3xARB queue for some gold.
User avatar
Posts: 134
Joined: 15 Aug 2010, 01:31
First Video: Wireless
Location: Australia

Re: LRRDraft #71 - Pot O' Gold

Postby DaMage » 18 Mar 2015, 19:07

I don't know if it was planned this way, but having Graham only in the left channel and James only in the right makes it really hard to hear.....especially for someone like me who is deaf in one ear.

Fun draft though and that format looks insane.
User avatar
Posts: 2112
Joined: 29 Apr 2013, 14:48
First Video: Zero Punctuation: X-Blades/Halo Wars
Location: Gold Coast, Australia

Re: LRRDraft #71 - Pot O' Gold

Postby korvys » 18 Mar 2015, 19:40

Borderposts basically are lands. By making you return your land, and coming into play tapped, as long as you have at least one land to begin with, they act just like comes-into-play tapped duals.
"Why does Sonic chill like dawgs?" - Graham
"Causation. Still a leading cause of correlation"" - Oglaf

Google+ / Twitter / Mastodon
Posts: 12
Joined: 11 Aug 2014, 15:58
First Video: Ransom

Re: LRRDraft #71 - Pot O' Gold

Postby Garbonzo42 » 19 Mar 2015, 16:57

In M2G2, you could have Maelstrom Pulsed his borderposts and left him mana-screwed off blue.


Which you figure out literally a minute after I decide to post this... :oops:
I should finish the video before commenting.
Posts: 21
Joined: 28 Jul 2014, 19:08
First Video: Unskippable

Re: LRRDraft #71 - Pot O' Gold

Postby chaucer345 » 30 May 2015, 10:24

Two things:

1) Have you considered that your games and deck might be better for this sort of draft if you gave yourself carte blanche to take commons over uncommons?

2) Have you considered doing a nudity draft? No think about it, you did the best dressed and noticed how many cards lacked clothing entirely, so why not take cards that show the least clothes to do the inverse?

Return to “MtG”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest