The First Rule

Talk about the latest LRR video or discuss your past favorites.
User avatar
KingOfDoma
Posts: 25
Joined: 14 Mar 2011, 16:07
First Video: ... ah, one of the Unskippables, I think
Location: Calgary
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby KingOfDoma » 04 Apr 2011, 20:14

I am adding my voice to the "No Rules Means No Pants" choir. This is a thing that needs to happen... and be implemented.

*will be the King of Doma and of No Pants*
Image

ImageImageImage
User avatar
WAYF
Posts: 546
Joined: 09 Sep 2010, 23:51
First Video: Unskippable: The Getaway
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby WAYF » 04 Apr 2011, 22:15

I would like to agree with pretty much everybody else. I wish to in no respect understate my appreciation for James's frustrated meditating, or for Paul's really accurate satirical questioning, not to mention the really nice-looking special effects which came with the apparent levitation and energy ball powers.
HOWEVER, Kathleen De Vere absolutely knocked the stinger out of the park. "No rules means no pants!!" is the best thing I have heard all week. :mrgreen:
"My favourite song is 'Girl Panic!'... because girls make me panic... in a good way!"
- Simon Le Bon.
User avatar
tak197
Feito Com Fruta
Posts: 9010
Joined: 13 Mar 2007, 19:20
First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby tak197 » 04 Apr 2011, 22:54

Jenny_Spaghetti wrote:My 6-year-old says "DUH, mom. They obviously mean that the first rule of meditation is that there are no rules of meditation. Besides, meditation is dumb without yoga."

:P


Smartass kid.
Image
Image
User avatar
Slack Mesa
Posts: 421
Joined: 26 May 2010, 14:28
First Video: Green

Re: The First Rule

Postby Slack Mesa » 04 Apr 2011, 22:58

So many of you are pleading for a "No rules means no pants" T-shirt, but if LRR actually makes such a shirt, you'll probably buy one and wear it with trousers.

You guys probably get told this a lot, but you're just not dedicated enough. If you really believed in the message, you'd be asking for "No rules means no pants" underwear.
User avatar
JackSlack
Posts: 4572
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 19:46
First Video: ENN, but I forget which.
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: The First Rule

Postby JackSlack » 05 Apr 2011, 00:35

Vanguard wrote:If you want to see odd, Jack, watch Deeply Religious, which is still my favorite sketch LRR has ever done.


... OK, wow. Yeah. That one? That's in the weird territory. Hilarious, mind you. I love that one.
Lisra
Posts: 355
Joined: 07 Dec 2009, 12:43
First Video: Commodore Hustle 4
Location: Nijmegen, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby Lisra » 05 Apr 2011, 00:46

Slack Mesa wrote:So many of you are pleading for a "No rules means no pants" T-shirt, but if LRR actually makes such a shirt, you'll probably buy one and wear it with trousers.

You guys probably get told this a lot, but you're just not dedicated enough. If you really believed in the message, you'd be asking for "No rules means no pants" underwear.


We could wear a shirt at the beach. Obeying the rule *and* socially acceptable context!
Adulthood can go fuck itself.
I'm not a girl. (:
User avatar
Kdz
Posts: 615
Joined: 22 Jan 2009, 19:47
First Video: Son of a Bitch
Location: TN, USA

Re: The First Rule

Postby Kdz » 05 Apr 2011, 02:04

Great video, I basically agree with everybody here on pretty much everything (including the shirt idea), though I would like to say that while I enjoyed the stinger, I don't think it was the highlight everyone else did.

Also, just a nitpick, but I believe after the James-energy-ball-thing effect, James' hand disappears. No big, doesn't detract or anything, just pointing it out.
User avatar
Gap Filler
Posts: 1665
Joined: 29 Apr 2010, 05:22
First Video: The Job
Location: a place no respectable man would be seen in
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby Gap Filler » 05 Apr 2011, 02:28

Classic Paul dialogue. James doing the stern, authoritative sensei thing (which probably wouldn't have fit Morgan so well). Kathleen being Kathleen. Very old school feel.

I'd call Paul's sketches weird in terms of logic whereas Kathleen's are weird in a gross out sense.
"In the neighbourhood of infinity; it was the time of the giant moths..."
User avatar
Master Gunner
Defending us from The Dutch!
Posts: 19383
Joined: 29 Oct 2006, 12:19
First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
Location: In Limbo.
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby Master Gunner » 05 Apr 2011, 04:13

Make this shirt, and I will be obliged to get a kilt to go with it. Or because kilts are expensive and I'm cheap, go the Morgan route and just wear a skirt with it.
Last edited by Master Gunner on 05 Apr 2011, 06:31, edited 1 time in total.
TheRocket wrote:Apparently the crotch area could not contain the badonkadonk area.
Twitter | Click here to join the Desert Bus Community Chat.
User avatar
ElementalAlchemist
Posts: 278
Joined: 19 Feb 2011, 16:54
First Video: Rejected WiiPlay Games

Re: The First Rule

Postby ElementalAlchemist » 05 Apr 2011, 04:25

WAYF wrote:HOWEVER, Kathleen De Vere absolutely knocked the stinger out of the park. "No rules means no pants!!" is the best thing I have heard all week. :mrgreen:

I know I've said it already, but yes, still this. Over and over again. :D
User avatar
aeric90
Posts: 2866
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 06:09
First Video: How to Talk Like a Pirate
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby aeric90 » 05 Apr 2011, 05:44

Slack Mesa wrote:So many of you are pleading for a "No rules means no pants" T-shirt, but if LRR actually makes such a shirt, you'll probably buy one and wear it with trousers.

You guys probably get told this a lot, but you're just not dedicated enough. If you really believed in the message, you'd be asking for "No rules means no pants" underwear.


Wear it as a protest of the rules based society that we live in.
Wear it as a cautionary tale of what would truely happen if we lived in a world with no rules.
Wear it in protest of the pants you are wearing.

There are so many interpretations.
Join The War Against Pants
http://twitter.com/aeric90
User avatar
Metcarfre
Posts: 13676
Joined: 08 Jul 2008, 13:52
First Video: Not Applicable
Location: Vancouver, B.C.

Re: The First Rule

Postby Metcarfre » 05 Apr 2011, 10:49

Heh, I thought James was gonna be Morgan, until figured out costumes can be worn by anybody.
*
User avatar
Xtasisanu
Posts: 16
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 07:25
First Video: The Job
Location: In the Corner of Texas
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby Xtasisanu » 06 Apr 2011, 03:58

Seems like the master needs to review his teaching methods. Also Yes to no pants.
"Something witty and revealing" - Generic
pokute
Posts: 226
Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 10:41
First Video: Phailhaüs

Re: The First Rule

Postby pokute » 06 Apr 2011, 07:28

No rules means no pants indeed.

edit: Oh, and can we have a version of the "No rules means no pants" T-shirt with a chibi-Kathleen going "woop woop wooop woooooop!" on the back?
User avatar
themanwith4names
Posts: 9
Joined: 05 Apr 2011, 21:06
First Video: rejected wii play games

Re: The First Rule

Postby themanwith4names » 06 Apr 2011, 08:56

I agree with with old guy. students should not question their teachers. especially if their teachers can murder them with a thought.
I am with the rare few.
User avatar
the amativeness
Posts: 3735
Joined: 31 Jul 2008, 19:53
Location: America, where everyone sues everyone, always, for everything.

Re: The First Rule

Postby the amativeness » 06 Apr 2011, 21:41

zA: How do I relax?
Evil Jim: Jerk off.
Frozengale: You know you're on the internet when Masturbation is the first suggestion.
PodX140
Posts: 42
Joined: 03 Dec 2010, 17:55
First Video: The Job

Re: The First Rule

Postby PodX140 » 10 Apr 2011, 23:34

I sighed after seeing the beautiful pebble work be countered by the blow my own hand off fireball that james fires.

This is still LRR after all, and I wouldn't want it any other way :D
User avatar
iamafish
Posts: 4804
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 10:28
First Video: Crime and Punishment
Location: Oxford/Worcestershire, England
Contact:

Re: The First Rule

Postby iamafish » 01 Feb 2012, 11:34

bump!!!!!!

you may think that no rules means no pants, but in 397 AD, the Roman Emperor Honorius issued a law banning the wearing of trousers in Rome, so in some cases, the rules DO mean no pants.

And this is why I study history at uni.
Thoughts From a Fish Bowl<------ my blog...

My Twitter

iamafish never wrote:the male trouser snake is evidence that evolution has no sense of aesthetics

Return to “LRR Video Discussion”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests