The First Rule
- KingOfDoma
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 14 Mar 2011, 16:07
- First Video: ... ah, one of the Unskippables, I think
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Re: The First Rule
I am adding my voice to the "No Rules Means No Pants" choir. This is a thing that needs to happen... and be implemented.
*will be the King of Doma and of No Pants*
*will be the King of Doma and of No Pants*
- WAYF
- Posts: 546
- Joined: 09 Sep 2010, 23:51
- First Video: Unskippable: The Getaway
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Re: The First Rule
I would like to agree with pretty much everybody else. I wish to in no respect understate my appreciation for James's frustrated meditating, or for Paul's really accurate satirical questioning, not to mention the really nice-looking special effects which came with the apparent levitation and energy ball powers.
HOWEVER, Kathleen De Vere absolutely knocked the stinger out of the park. "No rules means no pants!!" is the best thing I have heard all week.
HOWEVER, Kathleen De Vere absolutely knocked the stinger out of the park. "No rules means no pants!!" is the best thing I have heard all week.
"My favourite song is 'Girl Panic!'... because girls make me panic... in a good way!"
- Simon Le Bon.
- Simon Le Bon.
- tak197
- Feito Com Fruta
- Posts: 9010
- Joined: 13 Mar 2007, 19:20
- First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
- Location: Stroudsburg, PA
- Contact:
Re: The First Rule
Jenny_Spaghetti wrote:My 6-year-old says "DUH, mom. They obviously mean that the first rule of meditation is that there are no rules of meditation. Besides, meditation is dumb without yoga."
Smartass kid.
- Slack Mesa
- Posts: 421
- Joined: 26 May 2010, 14:28
- First Video: Green
Re: The First Rule
So many of you are pleading for a "No rules means no pants" T-shirt, but if LRR actually makes such a shirt, you'll probably buy one and wear it with trousers.
You guys probably get told this a lot, but you're just not dedicated enough. If you really believed in the message, you'd be asking for "No rules means no pants" underwear.
You guys probably get told this a lot, but you're just not dedicated enough. If you really believed in the message, you'd be asking for "No rules means no pants" underwear.
- JackSlack
- Posts: 4572
- Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 19:46
- First Video: ENN, but I forget which.
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: The First Rule
Vanguard wrote:If you want to see odd, Jack, watch Deeply Religious, which is still my favorite sketch LRR has ever done.
... OK, wow. Yeah. That one? That's in the weird territory. Hilarious, mind you. I love that one.
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: 07 Dec 2009, 12:43
- First Video: Commodore Hustle 4
- Location: Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: The First Rule
Slack Mesa wrote:So many of you are pleading for a "No rules means no pants" T-shirt, but if LRR actually makes such a shirt, you'll probably buy one and wear it with trousers.
You guys probably get told this a lot, but you're just not dedicated enough. If you really believed in the message, you'd be asking for "No rules means no pants" underwear.
We could wear a shirt at the beach. Obeying the rule *and* socially acceptable context!
Adulthood can go fuck itself.
I'm not a girl. (:
I'm not a girl. (:
Re: The First Rule
Great video, I basically agree with everybody here on pretty much everything (including the shirt idea), though I would like to say that while I enjoyed the stinger, I don't think it was the highlight everyone else did.
Also, just a nitpick, but I believe after the James-energy-ball-thing effect, James' hand disappears. No big, doesn't detract or anything, just pointing it out.
Also, just a nitpick, but I believe after the James-energy-ball-thing effect, James' hand disappears. No big, doesn't detract or anything, just pointing it out.
- Gap Filler
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: 29 Apr 2010, 05:22
- First Video: The Job
- Location: a place no respectable man would be seen in
- Contact:
Re: The First Rule
Classic Paul dialogue. James doing the stern, authoritative sensei thing (which probably wouldn't have fit Morgan so well). Kathleen being Kathleen. Very old school feel.
I'd call Paul's sketches weird in terms of logic whereas Kathleen's are weird in a gross out sense.
I'd call Paul's sketches weird in terms of logic whereas Kathleen's are weird in a gross out sense.
"In the neighbourhood of infinity; it was the time of the giant moths..."
- Master Gunner
- Defending us from The Dutch!
- Posts: 19383
- Joined: 29 Oct 2006, 12:19
- First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
- Location: In Limbo.
Re: The First Rule
Make this shirt, and I will be obliged to get a kilt to go with it. Or because kilts are expensive and I'm cheap, go the Morgan route and just wear a skirt with it.
Last edited by Master Gunner on 05 Apr 2011, 06:31, edited 1 time in total.
Twitter | Click here to join the Desert Bus Community Chat.TheRocket wrote:Apparently the crotch area could not contain the badonkadonk area.
- ElementalAlchemist
- Posts: 278
- Joined: 19 Feb 2011, 16:54
- First Video: Rejected WiiPlay Games
Re: The First Rule
WAYF wrote:HOWEVER, Kathleen De Vere absolutely knocked the stinger out of the park. "No rules means no pants!!" is the best thing I have heard all week.
I know I've said it already, but yes, still this. Over and over again.
- aeric90
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 06:09
- First Video: How to Talk Like a Pirate
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: The First Rule
Slack Mesa wrote:So many of you are pleading for a "No rules means no pants" T-shirt, but if LRR actually makes such a shirt, you'll probably buy one and wear it with trousers.
You guys probably get told this a lot, but you're just not dedicated enough. If you really believed in the message, you'd be asking for "No rules means no pants" underwear.
Wear it as a protest of the rules based society that we live in.
Wear it as a cautionary tale of what would truely happen if we lived in a world with no rules.
Wear it in protest of the pants you are wearing.
There are so many interpretations.
- Metcarfre
- Posts: 13676
- Joined: 08 Jul 2008, 13:52
- First Video: Not Applicable
- Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Re: The First Rule
Heh, I thought James was gonna be Morgan, until figured out costumes can be worn by anybody.
*
- Xtasisanu
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 07:25
- First Video: The Job
- Location: In the Corner of Texas
- Contact:
Re: The First Rule
Seems like the master needs to review his teaching methods. Also Yes to no pants.
"Something witty and revealing" - Generic
Re: The First Rule
No rules means no pants indeed.
edit: Oh, and can we have a version of the "No rules means no pants" T-shirt with a chibi-Kathleen going "woop woop wooop woooooop!" on the back?
edit: Oh, and can we have a version of the "No rules means no pants" T-shirt with a chibi-Kathleen going "woop woop wooop woooooop!" on the back?
- themanwith4names
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 05 Apr 2011, 21:06
- First Video: rejected wii play games
Re: The First Rule
I agree with with old guy. students should not question their teachers. especially if their teachers can murder them with a thought.
I am with the rare few.
- the amativeness
- Posts: 3737
- Joined: 31 Jul 2008, 19:53
- Location: America, where everyone sues everyone, always, for everything.
Re: The First Rule
zA: How do I relax?
Evil Jim: Jerk off.
Frozengale: You know you're on the internet when Masturbation is the first suggestion.
Re: The First Rule
I sighed after seeing the beautiful pebble work be countered by the blow my own hand off fireball that james fires.
This is still LRR after all, and I wouldn't want it any other way
This is still LRR after all, and I wouldn't want it any other way
- iamafish
- Posts: 4804
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 10:28
- First Video: Crime and Punishment
- Location: Oxford/Worcestershire, England
- Contact:
Re: The First Rule
bump!!!!!!
you may think that no rules means no pants, but in 397 AD, the Roman Emperor Honorius issued a law banning the wearing of trousers in Rome, so in some cases, the rules DO mean no pants.
And this is why I study history at uni.
you may think that no rules means no pants, but in 397 AD, the Roman Emperor Honorius issued a law banning the wearing of trousers in Rome, so in some cases, the rules DO mean no pants.
And this is why I study history at uni.
Thoughts From a Fish Bowl<------ my blog...
My Twitter
My Twitter
iamafish never wrote:the male trouser snake is evidence that evolution has no sense of aesthetics
Return to “LRR Video Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests