Oh hey maybe a good way to have a discussion is to not disappear from the forum for weeks at a time. Hm.
taza wrote:And your suggested attitude is even crazier. "Change yourself to win the affection of another." Yeah, that's going to end badly.
Hahaha
Hahahahahaha
Let's get one thing straight here, taza; ladies, gentlemen: Every relationship is built on compromise. Every single one of them. A relationship with no compromise is either doomed to fail or abusive. You'll never meet someone who likes all of the same things you like, dislikes all of the same things you dislike, enjoys everything you do and agrees with you on every point. If you do find someone like that, congratulations. You have a stalker.
Now, does this mean you have to give up the things you love in the quest to find that mythical "One"?
Yeah, maybe. It's situational, of course, but courtship is all about checks and balances. Saying shit like "It's crazy to change yourself to win the affections of another" is a useless obfuscatory tactic that assumes my argument is that you have to sit down and just re-arrange your personality, when it's not. It's not inconceivable to work on yourself to be more appealing to the opposite sex. The assumption that everyone is on equal footing and there's just some girls out there who don't like you so you should just kick them to the curb sounds valid but it is very easy for it to become deformed.
Some people aren't going to love you no matter what. And while you can change, it requires actually wanting to change for yourself. Either way, if someone isn't into you, the sane response is to go for someone else - because anything else is really fucking creepy.
Hahaha, I like how you're trying to turn it around to make it look like I'm the one advocating something creepy and unsavory. Let's take a look at the facts, jack.
The part of my post everyone seems to have latched onto was the part where they interpret me as claiming they are all smelly and obsessed with Yu-Gi-Oh. It's easy to refute. You might hate Yu-Gi-Oh, and there's no way for anyone to independently verify the levels of olfactory offensiveness you currently reside at. Bam, there you go, rebuttal to my point that is bullet-proof because I can't tell you what your interests are, right?
But that doesn't actually have anything to do with what I was saying. What I was saying is that the Nice Guy effect stems directly from a person's reluctance to admit inadequacy. It doesn't matter how you're inadequate. I chose two stereotypically nerdy things for illustrative purposes because Nice Guys, on average, tend to be nerdy, socially-stunted people. But they don't mean a thing within the scheme of my example. Nerdiness doesn't necessarily correlate to Nice Guyism. The problem is that a Nice Guy shifts the blame off of himself and to the girl. It's the girl's fault for having a stupid brain that categorized him from "fuckable" to "just a friend" before he could make a move. It's not the Nice Guy's fault for not making the move, and it's certainly not his fault for just being undesirable. Because no one wants to admit that they are undesirable.
That's the problem. It doesn't matter if I say you're undesirable because you have hygiene issues and an obsession with a card game, or if I say you're undesirable because you're too busy slam-dunking on the moon to hold up a relationship. What matters is that it is psychologically and emotionally painful to admit that you might need to work on yourself, so most people just don't admit it. It's much easier to say that it's the mythical "Friend Zone," that it's the girl's fault. Do you see how that is problematic?