Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
- Smeghead
- Bear Hunter S
- Posts: 2409
- Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 23:46
- First Video: The Writers Room
- Location: *sigh* Haparanda, Sweden
- Contact:
Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Pregnancy begins 2 weeks before conception now the law in Arizona
There comes a moment when one has to say "Seriusly, this can't be true!" and this is the time.
Seriusly, this can't be true! Someone please tell me it isn't!
So yeah, Arizona making wierd laws again, this time the laws of nature and time have to bend over for Arizona.
"In Arizona, women are now legally pregnant two weeks before conception, according to a new law, the Orwellianly-named, “Women’s Health and Safety Act,” signed yesterday by Republican Governor Jan Brewer"
So if you are a woman living in Arizona; congratullations! you might now legaly be pregnant if you end up having sex in the next 2 weeks.
no seriusly, someone tell me this is all a bad joke
There comes a moment when one has to say "Seriusly, this can't be true!" and this is the time.
Seriusly, this can't be true! Someone please tell me it isn't!
So yeah, Arizona making wierd laws again, this time the laws of nature and time have to bend over for Arizona.
"In Arizona, women are now legally pregnant two weeks before conception, according to a new law, the Orwellianly-named, “Women’s Health and Safety Act,” signed yesterday by Republican Governor Jan Brewer"
So if you are a woman living in Arizona; congratullations! you might now legaly be pregnant if you end up having sex in the next 2 weeks.
no seriusly, someone tell me this is all a bad joke
Last edited by Smeghead on 18 Apr 2012, 13:20, edited 1 time in total.
- The_Doctor
- Posts: 340
- Joined: 14 Mar 2012, 03:47
- First Video: le cafe
- Location: The "other" Victoria
Re: Nature and time doesn't facture into Arizona law
and this is why there should be a competancy test for taking public office...
Has Tardis, will travel
- Drinnik
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 15:15
- First Video: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/v
- Location: Colchester, UK
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
My brain just broke reading that. Surely there's something in the constitution they can use to block this?
- Smeghead
- Bear Hunter S
- Posts: 2409
- Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 23:46
- First Video: The Writers Room
- Location: *sigh* Haparanda, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Drinnik wrote:My brain just broke reading that. Surely there's something in the constitution they can use to block this?
How about the laws of nature?
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
the laws of causality perhaps.
- Lyinginbedmon
- Posts: 10808
- Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
- First Video: BioShocked
- Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
- Contact:
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
I'd say common sense but we all know that doesn't often appear in politics.
Does anyone have the actual text of this legislature for me to look over? Having trouble finding it and I'd really like to know precisely what the frack was going through their heads.
Does anyone have the actual text of this legislature for me to look over? Having trouble finding it and I'd really like to know precisely what the frack was going through their heads.
Morgan wrote:Lyinginbedmon is short, but he makes up for it in awesomeness
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
If I do a kickstarter called 'Get ninja the fuck outta here', would anybody donate?
EJ wrote:Lyinginbedmon, I'm looking forward to when Paul or Graham reset your & Elomin's post count back to zero. If you keep it up it's bound to happen =p
Noblesse Oblige
Buksvager!
- Smeghead
- Bear Hunter S
- Posts: 2409
- Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 23:46
- First Video: The Writers Room
- Location: *sigh* Haparanda, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
gcninja wrote:If I do a kickstarter called 'Get ninja the fuck outta here', would anybody donate?
if I had any money, I would
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Well do a twofer and ill get sable out too
EJ wrote:Lyinginbedmon, I'm looking forward to when Paul or Graham reset your & Elomin's post count back to zero. If you keep it up it's bound to happen =p
Noblesse Oblige
Buksvager!
- Theremin
- Posts: 7603
- Joined: 30 Nov 2008, 12:24
- First Video: A girl must have some secrets.
- Location: Bristol, England
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Ah, but will there be posters? Every Kickstarter needs posters.
- Master Gunner
- Defending us from The Dutch!
- Posts: 19383
- Joined: 29 Oct 2006, 12:19
- First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
- Location: In Limbo.
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Lyinginbedmon wrote:I'd say common sense but we all know that doesn't often appear in politics.
Does anyone have the actual text of this legislature for me to look over? Having trouble finding it and I'd really like to know precisely what the frack was going through their heads.
What I got from the article is that the goal of this is to make the window in which women can get abortions to be as narrow as possible. Under the law, you can get an abortion only before the point of viability, when the fetus could survive outside the womb, which occurs at 22-24 weeks. If a fetus has a severe or life-threatening problem, it is not likely to be discovered until an ultrasound at around 20 weeks. So at present, there is a window of 2-4 weeks where a woman may discover that her fetus is at severe risk, and can choose to abort it.
Now, the new law redefines how to calculate the present gestation length, starting the timer at the first day of the last menstrual period (basically, the last time a woman started bleeding), rather than the likely date of conception. This is where the two weeks comes from. Combined with other parts of the bill, this means that a woman may learn that the fetus she is carrying is almost certain to die within hours of being born (and also possibly threaten her life as well, especially as births are more dangerous than abortions), but already be past the deadline for her to legally have an abortion (or be unable to have an abortion before the deadline), forcing her to carry the doomed fetus to term.
Regardless of ones stance on abortion, this appears to be a ridiculous and dangerous law, that completely ignores the rights and safety of pregnant women.
Twitter | Click here to join the Desert Bus Community Chat.TheRocket wrote:Apparently the crotch area could not contain the badonkadonk area.
- Smeghead
- Bear Hunter S
- Posts: 2409
- Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 23:46
- First Video: The Writers Room
- Location: *sigh* Haparanda, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
I do hope someone make a case about this, exploiting the law somehow.
Back in the 20:th century, homosexuality was considdered a "mental illness" here in sweden until a large group of gay people in the 1970s decided to make a gesture and exploit that by all calling in sick since they were legally considdered "ill".
The government got the hint and dropped the mentally ill thing.
Back in the 20:th century, homosexuality was considdered a "mental illness" here in sweden until a large group of gay people in the 1970s decided to make a gesture and exploit that by all calling in sick since they were legally considdered "ill".
The government got the hint and dropped the mentally ill thing.
- Drdiggit42
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: 03 May 2011, 13:13
- First Video: Bagel Time
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Could they have an abortion out of state though? Also, I'm not familiar with state laws, but can't laws be voted down by the people. Surely the majority of Arizona doesn't agree with this.
All problems can be solved by trebuchets and/or fire.
When you're a pessimist there are only good surprises.
Steam ID - DrDiggit42(Currently: Indignity: ■■■■■) Add me if you like.
When you're a pessimist there are only good surprises.
Steam ID - DrDiggit42(Currently: Indignity: ■■■■■) Add me if you like.
- Lyinginbedmon
- Posts: 10808
- Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
- First Video: BioShocked
- Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
- Contact:
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Drdiggit42 wrote:Could they have an abortion out of state though? Also, I'm not familiar with state laws, but can't laws be voted down by the people. Surely the majority of Arizona doesn't agree with this.
One thing I've learned over the years is to never underestimate the stupidity of the vox populi of American states.
Morgan wrote:Lyinginbedmon is short, but he makes up for it in awesomeness
- the amativeness
- Posts: 3737
- Joined: 31 Jul 2008, 19:53
- Location: America, where everyone sues everyone, always, for everything.
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
What.
What.
...
What.
What.
...
What.
zA: How do I relax?
Evil Jim: Jerk off.
Frozengale: You know you're on the internet when Masturbation is the first suggestion.
- EnglishMQ
- Posts: 568
- Joined: 02 May 2010, 02:55
- First Video: The one where Paul was a crazy scientist
- Location: Guernsey
- Contact:
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
So once you enter Arizona you enter into a perpetual state of pregnancy?
- The_Doctor
- Posts: 340
- Joined: 14 Mar 2012, 03:47
- First Video: le cafe
- Location: The "other" Victoria
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Master Gunner wrote:Combined with other parts of the bill, this means that a woman may learn that the fetus she is carrying is almost certain to die within hours of being born (and also possibly threaten her life as well, especially as births are more dangerous than abortions), but already be past the deadline for her to legally have an abortion (or be unable to have an abortion before the deadline), forcing her to carry the doomed fetus to term.
Sounds like a pretty solid manslaughter case if somebody dies as a result of this.
Has Tardis, will travel
- the amativeness
- Posts: 3737
- Joined: 31 Jul 2008, 19:53
- Location: America, where everyone sues everyone, always, for everything.
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Just remember, you can't spell manslaughter without laughter!
zA: How do I relax?
Evil Jim: Jerk off.
Frozengale: You know you're on the internet when Masturbation is the first suggestion.
- Lyinginbedmon
- Posts: 10808
- Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
- First Video: BioShocked
- Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
- Contact:
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
That sentence and your avatar mesh perfectly.
Morgan wrote:Lyinginbedmon is short, but he makes up for it in awesomeness
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
EnglishMQ wrote:So once you enter Arizona you enter into a perpetual state of pregnancy?
More like Schroedinger's pregnancy. You might be pregnant every cycle, but you can only know it retroactively.
Check out my webcomic, The Meddlers! (Currently not updating)
- Phailhammer
- Posts: 3236
- Joined: 14 Nov 2010, 05:15
- First Video: Fun With Microwaves (I think)
- Location: Hazelbrook, NSW, Australia
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
I heard this on the radio over here yesterday. The first thought that ran through my (and presumably the presenter's) head was "Wait, what? That's not how biology works."
Preacher wrote:Do you have one of those for every occasion, Phailhammer?
FictionPress stories:Geoff_B wrote:And lo, the plot to end the world was undone by a bandwidth exceeded notice.
The Vitaris Insurrection, The Outbreak (The latter not written by me, but I am in it.)
- Deedles
- Posts: 4043
- Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 13:19
- First Video: Man Cooking
- Location: A shoebox on Kashyyyk.
- Contact:
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
*return to repeatedly slamming my head into my desk*
Last edited by Deedles on 19 Apr 2012, 20:00, edited 1 time in total.
Hurp-De-Durp!
- Drinnik
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 15:15
- First Video: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/v
- Location: Colchester, UK
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Just thinking about this is giving my brain a nosebleed.
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
I, for one, am deeply concerned about MEN'S health and safety. Anyone else? I mean, from what I've heard no one is passing medical laws on behalf of all the menfolk out there, and that doesn't seem fair. How can we, in good conscience, worry about the health and safety of half the population, while ignoring the health and safety of the other half?
I say we we find a way to recklessly endanger the lives of everyone who has a penis while taking away their voices in the matter, to be quite sure that we are looking after everyone equally.
I say we we find a way to recklessly endanger the lives of everyone who has a penis while taking away their voices in the matter, to be quite sure that we are looking after everyone equally.
-
- Posts: 7669
- Joined: 30 Mar 2010, 21:08
- First Video: Rapidfire I
- Location: The Land of Unbearably Fashionable People and Lots of Cars
Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law
Oh, no, I think there was some senator or representative who was trying to draft an anti-viagra bill to point out how ridiculous some of this women's health stuff can be. Let me see if I can find it...
Edit: Well, here's the first link you get when you google anti viagra bill http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/13/nina-turner-viagra-contraception-bills_n_1341642.html
Edit: Well, here's the first link you get when you google anti viagra bill http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/13/nina-turner-viagra-contraception-bills_n_1341642.html
Return to “General Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests