Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Drop by and talk about anything you want. This is where all cheese-related discussions should go
User avatar
Smeghead
Bear Hunter S
Posts: 2409
Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 23:46
First Video: The Writers Room
Location: *sigh* Haparanda, Sweden
Contact:

Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Smeghead » 18 Apr 2012, 13:14

Pregnancy begins 2 weeks before conception now the law in Arizona

There comes a moment when one has to say "Seriusly, this can't be true!" and this is the time.
Seriusly, this can't be true! Someone please tell me it isn't!

So yeah, Arizona making wierd laws again, this time the laws of nature and time have to bend over for Arizona.

"In Arizona, women are now legally pregnant two weeks before conception, according to a new law, the Orwellianly-named, “Women’s Health and Safety Act,” signed yesterday by Republican Governor Jan Brewer"

So if you are a woman living in Arizona; congratullations! you might now legaly be pregnant if you end up having sex in the next 2 weeks.

no seriusly, someone tell me this is all a bad joke
Last edited by Smeghead on 18 Apr 2012, 13:20, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The_Doctor
Posts: 340
Joined: 14 Mar 2012, 03:47
First Video: le cafe
Location: The "other" Victoria

Re: Nature and time doesn't facture into Arizona law

Postby The_Doctor » 18 Apr 2012, 13:16

and this is why there should be a competancy test for taking public office...
Has Tardis, will travel
User avatar
Drinnik
Posts: 1976
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 15:15
First Video: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/v
Location: Colchester, UK

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Drinnik » 18 Apr 2012, 13:35

My brain just broke reading that. Surely there's something in the constitution they can use to block this?
dackwards d wrote:You'd think that anyone in the sciences would at least be open to experimentation.


Image
Image

Image
User avatar
Smeghead
Bear Hunter S
Posts: 2409
Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 23:46
First Video: The Writers Room
Location: *sigh* Haparanda, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Smeghead » 18 Apr 2012, 13:39

Drinnik wrote:My brain just broke reading that. Surely there's something in the constitution they can use to block this?


How about the laws of nature?
User avatar
Keab42
Posts: 6662
Joined: 27 May 2009, 16:38
Location: In England

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Keab42 » 18 Apr 2012, 13:44

the laws of causality perhaps.
Keab42: Keeb-forty-two Deal with it. @Keab42 | | +Keab42 | | Tumblr
User avatar
Lyinginbedmon
Posts: 10808
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
First Video: BioShocked
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Lyinginbedmon » 18 Apr 2012, 13:52

I'd say common sense but we all know that doesn't often appear in politics.

Does anyone have the actual text of this legislature for me to look over? Having trouble finding it and I'd really like to know precisely what the frack was going through their heads.
Image
Image
Morgan wrote:Lyinginbedmon is short, but he makes up for it in awesomeness
User avatar
gcninja
Posts: 4701
Joined: 13 Dec 2008, 11:57
Location: Grand Canyon, AZ

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby gcninja » 18 Apr 2012, 14:03

If I do a kickstarter called 'Get ninja the fuck outta here', would anybody donate?
EJ wrote:Lyinginbedmon, I'm looking forward to when Paul or Graham reset your & Elomin's post count back to zero. If you keep it up it's bound to happen =p

Noblesse Oblige
Buksvager!
User avatar
Smeghead
Bear Hunter S
Posts: 2409
Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 23:46
First Video: The Writers Room
Location: *sigh* Haparanda, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Smeghead » 18 Apr 2012, 14:06

gcninja wrote:If I do a kickstarter called 'Get ninja the fuck outta here', would anybody donate?


if I had any money, I would
User avatar
gcninja
Posts: 4701
Joined: 13 Dec 2008, 11:57
Location: Grand Canyon, AZ

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby gcninja » 18 Apr 2012, 14:12

Well do a twofer and ill get sable out too
EJ wrote:Lyinginbedmon, I'm looking forward to when Paul or Graham reset your & Elomin's post count back to zero. If you keep it up it's bound to happen =p

Noblesse Oblige
Buksvager!
User avatar
Theremin
Posts: 7603
Joined: 30 Nov 2008, 12:24
First Video: A girl must have some secrets.
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Theremin » 18 Apr 2012, 14:15

Ah, but will there be posters? Every Kickstarter needs posters.
User avatar
Master Gunner
Defending us from The Dutch!
Posts: 19383
Joined: 29 Oct 2006, 12:19
First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
Location: In Limbo.

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Master Gunner » 18 Apr 2012, 14:19

Lyinginbedmon wrote:I'd say common sense but we all know that doesn't often appear in politics.

Does anyone have the actual text of this legislature for me to look over? Having trouble finding it and I'd really like to know precisely what the frack was going through their heads.


What I got from the article is that the goal of this is to make the window in which women can get abortions to be as narrow as possible. Under the law, you can get an abortion only before the point of viability, when the fetus could survive outside the womb, which occurs at 22-24 weeks. If a fetus has a severe or life-threatening problem, it is not likely to be discovered until an ultrasound at around 20 weeks. So at present, there is a window of 2-4 weeks where a woman may discover that her fetus is at severe risk, and can choose to abort it.

Now, the new law redefines how to calculate the present gestation length, starting the timer at the first day of the last menstrual period (basically, the last time a woman started bleeding), rather than the likely date of conception. This is where the two weeks comes from. Combined with other parts of the bill, this means that a woman may learn that the fetus she is carrying is almost certain to die within hours of being born (and also possibly threaten her life as well, especially as births are more dangerous than abortions), but already be past the deadline for her to legally have an abortion (or be unable to have an abortion before the deadline), forcing her to carry the doomed fetus to term.

Regardless of ones stance on abortion, this appears to be a ridiculous and dangerous law, that completely ignores the rights and safety of pregnant women.
TheRocket wrote:Apparently the crotch area could not contain the badonkadonk area.
Twitter | Click here to join the Desert Bus Community Chat.
User avatar
Smeghead
Bear Hunter S
Posts: 2409
Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 23:46
First Video: The Writers Room
Location: *sigh* Haparanda, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Smeghead » 18 Apr 2012, 14:28

I do hope someone make a case about this, exploiting the law somehow.

Back in the 20:th century, homosexuality was considdered a "mental illness" here in sweden until a large group of gay people in the 1970s decided to make a gesture and exploit that by all calling in sick since they were legally considdered "ill".
The government got the hint and dropped the mentally ill thing.
User avatar
Drdiggit42
Posts: 1209
Joined: 03 May 2011, 13:13
First Video: Bagel Time
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Drdiggit42 » 18 Apr 2012, 14:33

Could they have an abortion out of state though? Also, I'm not familiar with state laws, but can't laws be voted down by the people. Surely the majority of Arizona doesn't agree with this.
All problems can be solved by trebuchets and/or fire.

When you're a pessimist there are only good surprises.

Steam ID - DrDiggit42(Currently: Indignity: ■■■■■) Add me if you like.
User avatar
Lyinginbedmon
Posts: 10808
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
First Video: BioShocked
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Lyinginbedmon » 18 Apr 2012, 14:54

Drdiggit42 wrote:Could they have an abortion out of state though? Also, I'm not familiar with state laws, but can't laws be voted down by the people. Surely the majority of Arizona doesn't agree with this.

One thing I've learned over the years is to never underestimate the stupidity of the vox populi of American states.
Image
Image
Morgan wrote:Lyinginbedmon is short, but he makes up for it in awesomeness
User avatar
the amativeness
Posts: 3737
Joined: 31 Jul 2008, 19:53
Location: America, where everyone sues everyone, always, for everything.

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby the amativeness » 18 Apr 2012, 15:02

What.

What.

...

What.
Image
zA: How do I relax?
Evil Jim: Jerk off.
Frozengale: You know you're on the internet when Masturbation is the first suggestion.
User avatar
EnglishMQ
Posts: 568
Joined: 02 May 2010, 02:55
First Video: The one where Paul was a crazy scientist
Location: Guernsey
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby EnglishMQ » 18 Apr 2012, 16:07

So once you enter Arizona you enter into a perpetual state of pregnancy?
User avatar
The_Doctor
Posts: 340
Joined: 14 Mar 2012, 03:47
First Video: le cafe
Location: The "other" Victoria

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby The_Doctor » 18 Apr 2012, 16:10

Master Gunner wrote:Combined with other parts of the bill, this means that a woman may learn that the fetus she is carrying is almost certain to die within hours of being born (and also possibly threaten her life as well, especially as births are more dangerous than abortions), but already be past the deadline for her to legally have an abortion (or be unable to have an abortion before the deadline), forcing her to carry the doomed fetus to term.

Sounds like a pretty solid manslaughter case if somebody dies as a result of this.
Has Tardis, will travel
User avatar
the amativeness
Posts: 3737
Joined: 31 Jul 2008, 19:53
Location: America, where everyone sues everyone, always, for everything.

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby the amativeness » 18 Apr 2012, 16:20

Just remember, you can't spell manslaughter without laughter!
Image
zA: How do I relax?
Evil Jim: Jerk off.
Frozengale: You know you're on the internet when Masturbation is the first suggestion.
User avatar
Lyinginbedmon
Posts: 10808
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
First Video: BioShocked
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Lyinginbedmon » 18 Apr 2012, 16:42

That sentence and your avatar mesh perfectly.
Image
Image
Morgan wrote:Lyinginbedmon is short, but he makes up for it in awesomeness
User avatar
Avistew
Posts: 2593
Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 18:34
First Video: Can't remember
Location: Oregon, USA

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Avistew » 18 Apr 2012, 17:02

EnglishMQ wrote:So once you enter Arizona you enter into a perpetual state of pregnancy?


More like Schroedinger's pregnancy. You might be pregnant every cycle, but you can only know it retroactively.
Check out my webcomic, The Meddlers! (Currently not updating)
User avatar
Phailhammer
Posts: 3236
Joined: 14 Nov 2010, 05:15
First Video: Fun With Microwaves (I think)
Location: Hazelbrook, NSW, Australia

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Phailhammer » 18 Apr 2012, 19:00

I heard this on the radio over here yesterday. The first thought that ran through my (and presumably the presenter's) head was "Wait, what? That's not how biology works."
Preacher wrote:Do you have one of those for every occasion, Phailhammer?
Geoff_B wrote:And lo, the plot to end the world was undone by a bandwidth exceeded notice.
FictionPress stories:
The Vitaris Insurrection, The Outbreak (The latter not written by me, but I am in it.)
User avatar
Deedles
Posts: 4043
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 13:19
First Video: Man Cooking
Location: A shoebox on Kashyyyk.
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Deedles » 18 Apr 2012, 19:09

Image

*return to repeatedly slamming my head into my desk*
Last edited by Deedles on 19 Apr 2012, 20:00, edited 1 time in total.
Hurp-De-Durp!
User avatar
Drinnik
Posts: 1976
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 15:15
First Video: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/v
Location: Colchester, UK

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Drinnik » 18 Apr 2012, 19:16

Just thinking about this is giving my brain a nosebleed.
dackwards d wrote:You'd think that anyone in the sciences would at least be open to experimentation.


Image
Image

Image
User avatar
Tally
Posts: 1063
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 02:07
First Video: 1337 rap
Location: Victoria BC
Contact:

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby Tally » 18 Apr 2012, 20:06

I, for one, am deeply concerned about MEN'S health and safety. Anyone else? I mean, from what I've heard no one is passing medical laws on behalf of all the menfolk out there, and that doesn't seem fair. How can we, in good conscience, worry about the health and safety of half the population, while ignoring the health and safety of the other half?

I say we we find a way to recklessly endanger the lives of everyone who has a penis while taking away their voices in the matter, to be quite sure that we are looking after everyone equally.
Image
JustAName
Posts: 7669
Joined: 30 Mar 2010, 21:08
First Video: Rapidfire I
Location: The Land of Unbearably Fashionable People and Lots of Cars

Re: Nature and time doesn't factore into Arizona law

Postby JustAName » 18 Apr 2012, 20:16

Oh, no, I think there was some senator or representative who was trying to draft an anti-viagra bill to point out how ridiculous some of this women's health stuff can be. Let me see if I can find it...

Edit: Well, here's the first link you get when you google anti viagra bill http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/13/nina-turner-viagra-contraception-bills_n_1341642.html
Alja-Markir wrote:Andy is the LRR Heart-throb.
Morgan is the LRR Crotch-throb.


And all I can do is read a book to stay awake. And it rips my life away, but it's a great escape.

Image

Return to “General Discussion”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests