loadingreadyrun.com

I ran the numbers, and it looks like the Best of 2022 Highlights video is going to need to be 1 hour, 46 minutes, and 19 seconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm-TxT1a7BQ 17:06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDMjhxv5MdY 31:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgtIgRSetlc 57:54

I trust LRR will be able to pull it off. Just gotta do more of them Jackboxes, Watch 'n' Plays, and AsskMasters, along with their usual amounts of standard faire, and they should have a solid repertoire to pull from.

I am confident in the accuracy of these calculations and excited by the implication that we'll have a nearly two hour long highlights video to enjoy, but fear for the editors' collective sanity.

I also fear for the highlights video of 2033, because if my calculations are correct it will be a year long, which doesn't seem possible given our current understanding of time.

Odd. My calculations gave me about 60 days for 2033.
I don't exceed 365 until 2036.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0kzp2mpLTc 1:20:27

Ok, so, the calculations need to be adjusted, it seems. But what sort of curve will it be . . . hmm . . .

So, let's approximate a maximum of 1 hour, 51 minutes, and 47 seconds for 2023's year end for now, with a minimum of 1 hour, 24 minutes, and 35 seconds.

They went under my minimum prediction. I am now le sad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7Ek3sjL5Vs (to bypass the anti-ad-block disaster, you can also use the nsfwyoutube method, but then you -definitely- want to have your ad-blockers active).

They deleted the video and reuploaded it to fix some problems where it was accidentally zoomed in too much for a few clips.
New link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGBdx5NYziA