Page 2 of 3
Posted: 17 May 2008, 06:33
by CtMolloy
Alja-Markir wrote:Melendwyr wrote:Um... scat porn. Scat porn.
Do I need to explain what 'scat' is? Please, please say no.
Scat-bap-bah-dah-deetley-deetley-deetley-doo-doobie-doo-wah!
~Alja~
I think i just burst an internal organ from laughing at that!
Posted: 17 May 2008, 10:38
by Kawaiicaps
You're right, he is probably counting on people wanting to see it because of the banning, but I didn't think "America" was in the practice of banning movies. they show some pretty crappy stuff all over the country and to ban this is a little strange to me. I mean, didn't anyone see it before it was booked in theaters. to pull it so close to release date is strange.
-^_^-
Posted: 17 May 2008, 10:41
by CyberTractor
America let a movie as stupid as Bug come out.
Clearly we don't ban movies based on content.
Posted: 17 May 2008, 10:47
by Kawaiicaps
what's bug?
-^_^-
Posted: 17 May 2008, 10:49
by CyberTractor
The worst movie ever.
It's about people that think they're covered in bugs.
They are not covered in bugs. People in the movie point out that they aren't covered in bugs. The people who think they're covered in bugs say that everyone else "is in on it."
Seriously. Boll makes better movies than that.
Posted: 17 May 2008, 16:33
by The Happy Friar
crap. that answers why I couldn't find any listings for it next week.
Posted: 17 May 2008, 19:32
by Tank_girl
I have seen Postal.. And it is AWEFULL!!!
WORST MOVIE EVER!
No seriously.
I i think they mean 4 screens in the US. I think there are more in Canada.
Posted: 17 May 2008, 19:40
by Kara
Tank_girl wrote:I i think they mean 4 screens in the US. I think there are more in Canada.
Probably.
Posted: 17 May 2008, 21:19
by Lavos
[quote='Stuttering Craig]
We all know Uwe Boll has made some crap movies BUT if you go into things with an open mind and don't label them "suck" before you have a chance to judge them then you may actualy dig what you're watch... hmmm... sounds like something that's gone on recently here at ScrewAttack.
Regardless, I still say that if you're not offended easily then you'd probably like what you see. I make no guarantees though[/quote]Done.
Posted: 18 May 2008, 03:05
by Red Charlie
Lavos wrote:[quote=Stuttering Craig]
We all know Uwe Boll has made some crap movies BUT if you go into things with an open mind and don't label them "suck" before you have a chance to judge them then you may actualy dig what you're watch... hmmm... sounds like something that's gone on recently here at ScrewAttack.
Regardless, I still say that if you're not offended easily then you'd probably like what you see. I make no guarantees though
Done.[/quote]
You use quote tags like this Lavos... See I quoted your erroneous quote.
Posted: 18 May 2008, 08:20
by Alja-Markir
Except the nature of his error caused you to inadvertantly make your own!
~Alja~
Posted: 18 May 2008, 08:22
by Lavos
Stuttering Craig wrote:We all know Uwe Boll has made some crap movies BUT if you go into things with an open mind and don't label them "suck" before you have a chance to judge them then you may actualy dig what you're watch... hmmm... sounds like something that's gone on recently here at ScrewAttack.
Regardless, I still say that if you're not offended easily then you'd probably like what you see. I make no guarantees though
Posted: 18 May 2008, 12:27
by Tank_girl
Lavos wrote:[quote='Stuttering Craig]
We all know Uwe Boll has made some crap movies BUT if you go into things with an open mind and don't label them "suck" before you have a chance to judge them then you may actualy dig what you're watch... hmmm... sounds like something that's gone on recently here at ScrewAttack.
Regardless, I still say that if you're not offended easily then you'd probably like what you see. I make no guarantees though
Done.[/quote]
Im not offended easily at all, and I almost left the theater.
Posted: 18 May 2008, 18:59
by Lord Chrusher
What sort of bad are we talking here? Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever bad or Freddy Got Fingered bad?
Posted: 18 May 2008, 22:45
by Beta-guy
I'm glad this is happening, after his short rant found here
http://youtube.com/watch?v=WWqCNmfJ1hY he came off arrogant, and egotistical, I go to a movie to be entertained, not to "wake up" and definitely not to see some guy butcher video games on the big screen...
Posted: 18 May 2008, 22:46
by Allen!
Beta-guy wrote:I'm glad this is happening, after his short rant found here
http://youtube.com/watch?v=WWqCNmfJ1hY he came off arrogant, and egotistical, I go to a movie to be entertained, not to "wake up" and definitely not to see some guy butcher video games on the big screen...
Then don't go to the movie, duh.
Posted: 18 May 2008, 23:05
by Cake
Tank_girl wrote:Lavos wrote:[quote='Stuttering Craig]
We all know Uwe Boll has made some crap movies BUT if you go into things with an open mind and don't label them "suck" before you have a chance to judge them then you may actualy dig what you're watch... hmmm... sounds like something that's gone on recently here at ScrewAttack.
Regardless, I still say that if you're not offended easily then you'd probably like what you see. I make no guarantees though
Im not offended easily at all, and I almost left the theater.
Now I have to see it.
Posted: 19 May 2008, 08:08
by empath
Cunning guy, isn't he?
'Get his film boycotted' (probably by small [s]bribes[/s] fees paid to the cinema-owning conglomerates - they get less money, but for
not showing his film and therefore keeping their screens clear to show OTHER films to make even MORE money) to drum up interest in it (I can't even count how many times I'd forgotten he was in the process of butchering
Postal...er, I mean 'filming a tribute'
)
Wraith; what odds are being made on this 'boycott' being reversed after a few weeks or so?
Posted: 19 May 2008, 08:15
by empath
Alja-Markir wrote:Melendwyr wrote:Um... scat porn. Scat porn.
Do I need to explain what 'scat' is? Please, please say no.
Scat-bap-bah-dah-deetley-deetley-deetley-doo-doobie-doo-wah!
~Alja~
You know? I think
coprophilia would be preferable to watching THIS GUY 'get it on'.
Posted: 19 May 2008, 08:23
by Alja-Markir
THAT GUY is mutha'fuckin' Scatman John.
Show some respect! Get down on your knees and beg forgiveness! If he chose to get his freak on in your presence, even through the medium of pornography, you should be humbled, awed, and consider yourself blessed!
If the brilliance of a thousands suns were to burst into the sky at once, that would be like the splendor of The Mighty One! Klatuu Verata Nikto! I am the walrus! I am the walrus! Paul is dead! Koo-koo-kachoo!
~Alja~
Posted: 20 May 2008, 01:18
by Tank_girl
Lord Chrusher wrote:What sort of bad are we talking here? Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever bad or Freddy Got Fingered bad?
Let me put it this way. Nothing is sacred.
Women, Children, baby killing, religion, race, September 11.
Nothing
Now there is deffinantly a right and a wrong way to make light and maybe even poke fun at touchy issues, But to degrade them entirely.... that is what Postal does in full force.
Posted: 20 May 2008, 06:30
by Master Gunner
See, now I want to see it just for how horrible it is. However, there is no way in LRR that I'm going to pay for it, or for anybody to prove that I've seen it.
Posted: 20 May 2008, 06:40
by Allen!
baby killing...... September 11.
And you thought these things should be 'sacred' before, neh?
We need to talk.
Also, from the way you've described it, Postal is the best movie of all time.
Posted: 20 May 2008, 07:04
by Kawaiicaps
I think this is going to be the best game to movie adaptation of boll's career. The game is about a guy that goes crazy and kills and maims with no regard for anyone else.
This movies seems to have that perfectly!
-^_^-
Posted: 20 May 2008, 08:12
by Alja-Markir
Allen! wrote:baby killing...... September 11.
And you thought these things should be 'sacred' before, neh?
We need to talk.
Also, from the way you've described it, Postal is the best movie of all time.
You minunderstand the meaning. Nothing being sacred means that anything can be depicted as being done to anything. If the movie held babies as sacred, the killing of babies would not be included as it would be too far over the line. If the film held the lives of terrorist victims as sacred, the mockery of such victims would not occur. Etc.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted."
~Alja~