tak197 wrote:C) Thank you for at least being supportive of our country to send your troops into battle with us, even if the majority of our reasoning for going into Afghanistan and Iraq was based on a fallacy of WMDs and terrorists. I mean, we KNOW Iran has WMDs, we KNOW Iran is run by Islamic fundamentalists, we KNOW Iran harbors terrorists. Yet we attack two other countries based on speculation? Would I be offsides if I said BUSH WAS A FUCKING RETARD, AND I TOLD YOU ALL SO SINCE 2001????
Point of note: Which is smarter, attacking forces you know do NOT possess WMDs, and that therefor cannot use them? Or attacking forces you know DO possess WMDs, and therefor may potentially use them?
"...neighboring Syria. The UN Council is currently investigating the attacks, with a special task force in place to determine the United States' culpability in provoking the attack via their unauthorized military incursion into Iranian airspace. Formal charge have not yet been declared, but threats of trade embargoes have arisen from both China and much of the European Union as..."
~Alja~