Supremely Legal
Supremely Legal
Justice is blind, and that's probably for the best. (Have you SEEN what they put in these games!?)
http://www.penny-arcade.com/patv/checkpoint/109/
-m
http://www.penny-arcade.com/patv/checkpoint/109/
-m
I am not angry at you.
Re: supremely Legal
There's something suspicious about that Heather Blerd. She spells her name on Facebook differently from the way she spells it on Twitter.
Re: supremely Legal
Um, You have the California law wrong, it was games judged violent by a different set of rules, not games rated M by the ESRB, that would of been made illegal to sell to minors. Meaning if an T game would been declared violent by whoever in california was in charge of deciding things, it would of been illegal as well...
Infact that's the whole reason the industry came out against the law as it made their efforts to self control such things moot, and put them in the purview of government agencies.
If it had just been california adding even more backing to the ESRB's ratings, I doubt it would of ever been brought to court.
Infact that's the whole reason the industry came out against the law as it made their efforts to self control such things moot, and put them in the purview of government agencies.
If it had just been california adding even more backing to the ESRB's ratings, I doubt it would of ever been brought to court.
the heart knows no greater tragedy than a breath that begins in love and ends in grief...
- Vigafre
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: 27 Jul 2009, 13:07
- First Video: Halo: The Future of Gaming
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: Supremely Legal
Now I'm curious what Roots song you confused with BEP.
- DarkMorford
- Posts: 138
- Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:28
- First Video: Desert Bus 3
- Location: Redmond, WA
- Contact:
Re: Supremely Legal
Funny as always, guys! Though the "Black-Eyed Peas Experience" jokes may have gone on just a little too long. Not enough to detract from the enjoyment, though.
What did bug me a bit was the glare off of Paul's right (house left) eyeglass lens. I don't know if it's entirely fixable given the lights you have access to, but please keep that in mind next time you have him do a segment. Thanks!
What did bug me a bit was the glare off of Paul's right (house left) eyeglass lens. I don't know if it's entirely fixable given the lights you have access to, but please keep that in mind next time you have him do a segment. Thanks!
http://www.twitter.com/DarkMorford
Vanilla Minecraft Server (1.11.2): minecraft.darkmorford.net
Modded Minecraft Server (DW20 1.10.2): ftb.lrrcraft.com
Vanilla Minecraft Server (1.11.2): minecraft.darkmorford.net
Modded Minecraft Server (DW20 1.10.2): ftb.lrrcraft.com
- Geoff_B
- Posts: 11637
- Joined: 06 Apr 2011, 13:13
- First Video: Installation Anxiety
- Location: Harrow, London
- Contact:
Re: Supremely Legal
best part of the episode? the shot of the bridesmaid at will and kate's wedding with her hands over her ears cos she didn't like the noise, which is understandable if it's anything like black eyed peas.
Re: Supremely Legal
Graham, why are you hitting on a senator in a PATV video?
- JackSlack
- Posts: 4572
- Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 19:46
- First Video: ENN, but I forget which.
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Supremely Legal
To be fair, the fight was for the status quo. That said, I love Graham's quiet disbelief.
- andy25100
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 09:51
- First Video: can't remember
- Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Re: Supremely Legal
the comment at the end was the funniest as the thing that hacking needs are suit's
Is feeling terribly happy, in england
- Duckay
- Posts: 3706
- Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 00:57
- First Video: Man Cooking
- Location: Central Coast, Australia
Re: Supremely Legal
I feel obligated to point out that M-rated games are allowed in Australia; it's just R-rated games that aren't. But then, I've also been led to believe that the definitions of M and R vary between the US, Canada, and Australia, so it's hard to delve into comparisons.
Also, senatorial sex scandals involving Graham? I'd pay to see that.
Also, senatorial sex scandals involving Graham? I'd pay to see that.
- Master Gunner
- Defending us from The Dutch!
- Posts: 19383
- Joined: 29 Oct 2006, 12:19
- First Video: How To Talk Like A Pirate
- Location: In Limbo.
Re: Supremely Legal
An "M" rating under the Australian Classification board is roughly equivalent to the ESRB's "Teen" or the MPAA's PG-13 rating. The "R" rating in Australia is not suitable for those 15 and under, making it similar to the ESRB's "Mature" rating (17+) or MPAA's "R" rating (parental supervision required if under 18). As your R rating is the highest that can be given to games, content that would warrant a R18+ if it were on film under your system, which would generally fit under our Mature game rating in ours, cannot be classified in Australia, banning it. Which is rediculous.
Twitter | Click here to join the Desert Bus Community Chat.TheRocket wrote:Apparently the crotch area could not contain the badonkadonk area.
- Duckay
- Posts: 3706
- Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 00:57
- First Video: Man Cooking
- Location: Central Coast, Australia
Re: Supremely Legal
We do also have the "in-between" rating "MA", which is basically "M, but more so" - M is "recommended for audiences 15 and older" (like The Sims games) and "MA" is "restricted to audiences 15 and older" (like... virtually all "mature" games that are released here, including a lot of games that would probably have been rated R if we had that).
It's basically a pain.
It's basically a pain.
Last edited by Duckay on 04 Jul 2011, 18:57, edited 1 time in total.
- Digital Dolphin
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: 03 Dec 2008, 03:49
- First Video: Canada Man
- Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Re: Supremely Legal
It felt like this episode was trying to be Feed Dump, with the Black Eyed Peas Experience run of jokes.
I like Feed Dump. But I also like Checkpoint... and I like them for different reasons. The sudden change in pacing for that section felt really jarring.
Otherwise the episode was good though
I like Feed Dump. But I also like Checkpoint... and I like them for different reasons. The sudden change in pacing for that section felt really jarring.
Otherwise the episode was good though
#TeamKroze
- Gap Filler
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: 29 Apr 2010, 05:22
- First Video: The Job
- Location: a place no respectable man would be seen in
- Contact:
Re: Supremely Legal
Bad times with the obscured Coming Up text in the stinger. Changing the text colour just this once might have been a good idea.
"In the neighbourhood of infinity; it was the time of the giant moths..."
- MowDownJoe
- Posts: 497
- Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 19:49
- First Video: Joystique
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Supremely Legal
I liked the Warp Zone/Series of Tubes you used to depict the Internet... yeah, outside of reddit, it does seem to mostly be porn and cats. And there are often overlaps...
- semysane
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 15 Dec 2009, 23:51
- First Video: Unskippable: Star Ocean: The Last Hope
- Location: Canadia
- Contact:
Re: supremely Legal
Rikadyn wrote:Um, You have the California law wrong, it was games judged violent by a different set of rules, not games rated M by the ESRB, that would of been made illegal to sell to minors. Meaning if an T game would been declared violent by whoever in california was in charge of deciding things, it would of been illegal as well...
Infact that's the whole reason the industry came out against the law as it made their efforts to self control such things moot, and put them in the purview of government agencies.
If it had just been california adding even more backing to the ESRB's ratings, I doubt it would of ever been brought to court.
While this is all insightful and useful information... would HAVE! It's would HAVE! Not would of!
Also, I loved the Black Eyed Peas jokes. God, do I ever hate that band.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest