Monopoly on Weird

Morgan · Postby **Morgan** » 17 Mar 2007, 17:51

i'm behind making things out of bees. especially if they are still capable of stinging people.

Dana · Postby **Dana** » 17 Mar 2007, 18:47

Deodorant made from live bees would be sweet. Deodorant made from dead bees is abhorrent, and will be punished. My bee-vengeance is swift and stinging.

DontPanic · Postby **DontPanic** » 17 Mar 2007, 22:43

The label is vague, saying "all natural ingredients" and there is a smiling cartoon bee on the cover.

I assume this is like the advertisment used on tuna cans, where we see a smiling fish with sunglasses telling us he's high in protein.

The Hitman · Postby **The Hitman** » 18 Mar 2007, 00:41

3mm4 wrote:That chick is wearing some seriously weird underwear.

You know, you're right.

At first I was thinking, "hot asian girl," but then I looked down, and now I seriously just can't get past how fucked up that underwear is. The fact that it's so high up is giving me a serious creepy old-man-pants vibe. Plus, it looks complicated: like the kind of thing you'd need some specialized training to remove. There would be workshops, maybe. You'd probably need to go through graduated licensing requirements.

And why is there so much material involved? Is it because she's not wearing a bra? Is there some kind of universal 'conservation of fabric' law at work here?

I simply can't make sense of a world in which underwear like that would exist.

robothero · Postby **robothero** » 18 Mar 2007, 14:08

3mm4 wrote:I like how it's always "Japan has come up with a new product." It's never a company.

One thing I learned from Kids in the Hall:

Contrary to popular belief, the Japanese are not a company; they're a country.

And that commercial for the milk was too slow-paced to be a real Japanese commercial.

tak197 · Postby **tak197** » 18 Mar 2007, 18:48

DontPanic wrote:I have soy milk in the fridge...and couldn't help but picture someone trying to jerk off a piece of tofu.

Oh God.

Processing the soybean pod for milk. Another one that could have been used by Alex and Graham in their W.E.T. video.

Wait, maybe not, cus that's kinda dirty.

As for the guy who takes filling a gas tank too literally, another "hold on, that one works for chicks" euphemism you could have used (if said man was gay) would be

That is one hot tranny in there.

I have a sick mind aren't I?

Dana · Postby **Dana** » 19 Mar 2007, 19:16

The Hitman wrote:
3mm4 wrote:That chick is wearing some seriously weird underwear.

You know, you're right.

At first I was thinking, "hot asian girl," but then I looked down, and now I seriously just can't get past how fucked up that underwear is. The fact that it's so high up is giving me a serious creepy old-man-pants vibe. Plus, it looks complicated: like the kind of thing you'd need some specialized training to remove. There would be workshops, maybe. You'd probably need to go through graduated licensing requirements.

And why is there so much material involved? Is it because she's not wearing a bra? Is there some kind of universal 'conservation of fabric' law at work here?

I simply can't make sense of a world in which underwear like that would exist.

Heehee...in my experience, most guys have enough trouble with bras. I always get a kick out of wearing some piece of clothing that gives a guy trouble. It's like an intelligence test. If the guy can figure out how to get my complicated clothing off, then he is smart enough, and I will be willing to shag him. Otherwise, he fails, and I'm off to greener pastures. Or smarter ones, at least.

Dr Frankenjam · Postby **Dr Frankenjam** » 20 Mar 2007, 09:55

Dana wrote:Heehee...in my experience, most guys have enough trouble with bras. I always get a kick out of wearing some piece of clothing that gives a guy trouble. It's like an intelligence test. If the guy can figure out how to get my complicated clothing off, then he is smart enough, and I will be willing to shag him. Otherwise, he fails, and I'm off to greener pastures. Or smarter ones, at least.

**takes notes**

AdmiralBarikir · Postby **AdmiralBarikir** » 20 Mar 2007, 13:42

Dr Frankenjam wrote:
Dana wrote:Heehee...in my experience, most guys have enough trouble with bras. I always get a kick out of wearing some piece of clothing that gives a guy trouble. It's like an intelligence test. If the guy can figure out how to get my complicated clothing off, then he is smart enough, and I will be willing to shag him. Otherwise, he fails, and I'm off to greener pastures. Or smarter ones, at least.

**takes notes**

**takes notes and makes several photocopies**

Dana · Postby **Dana** » 20 Mar 2007, 18:17

The Thrill · Postby **The Thrill** » 20 Mar 2007, 18:34

Dana wrote::shock:

Haven't you learned the golden rule of being a girl on the internet? Never say anything that could suggest that you are in any way a sexual person for there will be lust, and it'll be really creepy.

As for the "creepy underwear" it's a garter belt. Not all that creepy, just kinda old-school.

Dana · Postby **Dana** » 20 Mar 2007, 18:55

I've spent so much time around computer science guys, that I had forgotten that there are people out there that don't know that I can be damn terrifying when I need to be. I can say stuff like that around my fellow computer science students because they know that:
a) I am really damn smart.
b) I will kick them in the fork if they try any shit.
Also, in real life, I am one of the guys quite a lot, so I forget that most guys are filthy damn perverts.

Thanks for reminding me guys. Now I have yet another reason to be disappointed in humanity. :cry:

Also, if you have to take notes, you will probably fail.

Bryy M. Miller · Postby **Bryy M. Miller** » 20 Mar 2007, 20:38

Best one yet.

Best edited, best pace.

I was laughing overlappingly.

JesterJ. · Postby **JesterJ.** » 20 Mar 2007, 21:16

Tricky clothing sucks...

emma · Postby **emma** » 20 Mar 2007, 21:58

Dana wrote:Also, if you have to take notes, you will probably fail.

The woman makes a very good point.

Yukikaze · Postby **Yukikaze** » 03 Apr 2007, 13:20

I can't believe I just registered to a new message board with the sole purpose of making a post to an inactive thread.

It's a garter belt, it goes on over her panties, and has little clips on it that hold her stockings up. You guys don't watch enough anime.

The Thrill · Postby **The Thrill** » 03 Apr 2007, 13:58

Yukikaze wrote:I can't believe I just registered to a new message board with the sole purpose of making a post to an inactive thread.

It's a garter belt, it goes on over her panties, and has little clips on it that hold her stockings up. You guys don't watch enough anime.

Not only is it an inactive thread, but it's a redundant post too! If you look up about three posts you'll realise that I'd already clued people in on the garter belt thing.

Welcome to the forums though, if you plan to stick around.

Yukikaze · Postby **Yukikaze** » 03 Apr 2007, 14:11

oooo, I only read half of that post.

Yeah, planning on sticking around for a while. LRR is GENIUS funny!

emma · Postby **emma** » 03 Apr 2007, 15:14

I know what a garter belt is! But the underwear beneath it is weird.

Why are we still talking about this?

JesterJ. · Postby **JesterJ.** » 03 Apr 2007, 18:30

3mm4 wrote:I know what a garter belt is! But the underwear beneath it is weird.

Why are we still talking about this?

Because

JesterJ. wrote: Tricky clothing sucks...

Yukikaze · Postby **Yukikaze** » 03 Apr 2007, 21:35

it's just a pair of pink, lacy undies to match the garter belt and stockings.

I don't have any experience with a garter belt like I do with a bra(which, curiously, only aids me if I want to take it off myself... best not to ask), though I doubt they'd pose any real obstacle.

emma · Postby **emma** » 04 Apr 2007, 06:36

the implication was that the underwear comes up very high and is not flattering on the crotchal region
lets stop talking about this now

Monopoly on Weird

Who is online