Ground Zeroes Controversy

Talk about what you are playing now or join in with one of our forum games.
Kapol
Posts: 6120
Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 03:31
First Video: Whisky Tango Foxtrot
Location: The ever-shifting landscape of the mind

Re: Ground Zeroes Controversy

Postby Kapol » 06 Jul 2014, 07:07

Alex Steacy wrote:I think the type that really tilt me are the "PUSH X TO NOT DIE RIGHT NOW" where if you fuck up your timing you start again until you get the whole series right.


That's one thing I do like about the overall style of QTEs in Quantic Dream's games. I don't think there are any real ways to 'fail' the QTEs. If you do 'fail,' then your character just fails the action and the story continues on. I also feel that, when QTEs are a common occurrence and you know when to roughly expect them, they aren't nearly as bad. It's just the random ones that come out of nowhere and kill you that piss me off. RE4 had this problem in some areas, specifically times like when Krauser shows up. In other words, when they're a part of normal gameplay rather than a sudden way to check and make sure you're paying full attention to the game, I find QTEs to be a decent enough gameplay device.

Though I feel that's getting a bit off-topic from the main point of the thread.

Though this
User avatar
Alex Steacy
Posts: 2264
Joined: 12 Mar 2004, 22:35
First Video: Beats me! No seriously Graham hits me.
Location: In transit
Contact:

Re: Ground Zeroes Controversy

Postby Alex Steacy » 09 Jul 2014, 05:22

Yeah. I'm going to stick with what I said in a tweet some time ago:

"Metal Gear Solid V looks like it will have incredible stealth gameplay and some hugely problematic depictions of women."
Image

Return to “Video Games”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests